Alberta Sovereignty Act: Is Justin Trudeau Destroying Canada?
Does the Alberta Sovereignty Act circumvent, or accelerate plans for Trudeau's decimation of Canada and re-birth as an authoritarian state?
“Shortly after midnight on Thursday, the governing United Conservative party passed the Alberta Sovereignty Within A United Canada Act, after stripping away a contentious provision that would have allowed the provincial cabinet the power to bypass the legislature and rewrite laws.”
To which CAP respond in typically nihilistic fashion:
“If Justin Trudeau is going to destroy Canada, it must be done his way.”
Or rather, by way of a methodology driven by globalist ideologues and neo-communist Liberals. Admittedly, this is one sketchy area. Questions abound in CAP-land:
— Does PM Justin Trudeau desire as an end-game the dissolution of our country?
— Does Premier Danielle Smith’s Alberta Sovereignty Act circumvent, or accelerate plans for the decimation of Canada and its re-birth as an authoritarian state?
— Would Trudeau and his backers at World Economic Forum accept a neo-communist Canada devoid of inclusion of Western Canadian provinces?
We imagine a future scenario: Trudeau and the Liberals facilitate full sovereignty for the province of Quebec. While the Feds eviscerate English Canada, Quebec and its distinct culture are preserved. What else would a Trudeau do but save la belle province from the cultural destruction experienced by the remainder of our country?
Leaving Ontario and Atlantic provinces to transition to the stuff of the Trudeau family’s dreams: a “no core identity” nation which, over time, fills its core with a 3rd World-dominated neo-communist society.
Then there are Canada’s Western Provinces. At a basic level, Premier Smith has established legislation to empower Alberta, providing the province with a degree of autonomy found only in Quebec.
To which legacy media act in kind– “It’s an outrage. Can you imagine? The nerve of this Smith person, going to bat for her local constituents.”
Canadian media hate this kind of thing. “If Canadian politicians are going to work for ‘the people,’ those people better be located in Syria, Somalia or Haiti.”
Such is the twisted, butt-backwards sentiment espoused by Canada’s woke liberal contingent. Grand Patriarch, Justin Trudeau.
No surprise that CAP see things differently. In Saskatchewan, Premier Scott Moe has just said no to Trudeau’s seizure of firearms.
“Saskatchewan has introduced a new piece of legislation it says is aimed at protecting law-abiding firearms owners. The Saskatchewan Firearms Act passed first reading on Thursday.”“
“Manitoba has consistently stated that many aspects of the federal approach to gun crimes unnecessarily target lawful gun owners while having little impact on criminals, who are unlikely to follow gun regulations in any event.”
Do we detect cohesive push-back against Ottawa ramping up among Western Canadian provinces? Is this a nascent sign of political power consolidation in the West?
If so, you can bet your bottom Chinese yuan that Trudeau hates it. And if he hates it, so too does mainstream Canadian media. Who knows if Mr. Trudeau would be happy with a future structure of this nature.
More likely it is that Canada’s ersatz dictator wants all of Canada–with the exception of distinct society Quebec— to go down in the neo-communist flood. The more destruction, the better, being his modus operandi.
As it happens, Team Trudeau has a card-up-their-sleeve called First Nations Canada. They don’t want the Liberal’s gun restrictions. Dollars-to-donuts Trudeau accommodates–leaving our Old Stock communities the target of gun confiscation. This we have seen before– during China’s Communist Revolution, as one example.
“It’s not like Ottawa is a national government,” said Premier Smith.
“The way our country works is that we are a federation of sovereign, independent jurisdictions. They are one of those signatories to the constitution and the rest of us, as signatories to the constitution, have a right to exercise our sovereign powers in our own areas of jurisdiction.”
Oh my goodness. Logic, common sense, objectivity, and an accurate analysis of Canadian Federalism. How CBC hate this kind of thing. Globe & Mail must be choking on their soy lattes.
“This is not post-modern Canada. That creature has no logic. Based purely on emotion, political correctness and WEF-inspired communism, we must appeal to the passions of the people.”
“This is how fascist governments of history had their success, and that’s the bag we work out of.”
We stumble on the great globalist paradox of modern times. Trudeau, Hussen, Alghabra, Mendicino, Blair, Guilbeault, Rodriguez, and the rest hold fast to a post-modern ideal:
If it’s good for Old Stock Canadians, Conservatives, Anglophones or Christians— forget about it. If the benefit goes toward Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan or Chad, go for it with full gusto.
What an absurdity it is. Cultural Action Party are very much impressed with Premier Danielle Smith. Thus far, that is. In turn, we understand how media would interpret such a stand.
CAP is racist. To heck with ’em– we have no respect for Liberal snowflakes and their ilk.
Is Justin Trudeau in the process of destroying Canada with full intent? Perhaps only Liberal MP Iqra Khalid’s hair-stylist knows for sure.
Whatever the bottom line, one look at Justin Trudeau tells us trouble is his middle name.
Trudeau has always been an accident looking for a place to happen. His narcissism doesn't allow him to see reality. Couldn't pick a worse person for a Canadian PM or burger flipper.
It’s passing strange where the people are so unfamiliar with their constitution they argue for any shenanigans the Liberal party gets up to as being entirely within the purview of the prime minister. I have written here and elsewhere that Canada is a federation not a confederation despite that the association affirmed in 1867 has been called Confederation since then. One has the impression that the premiers of Canada’s provinces are not familiar with Canada’s constitution.
I have also written that it was the elite in what today corresponds with modern southern Quebec that wanted Canada to be a federation. Jurisdictions in a federation have more autonomy than would be the case in a confederation.
The elites in Canada East hated that Great Britain governed Canada after the Treaty of Paris was signed in 1763. Through this treaty, France ceded all of New France to Great Britain (except Louisiana.) New France was the most successful of the Old World countries endeavours in North America up until the American Revolution. New France controlled the vast continental interior of North America. …Until the American Revolution after which Great Britain recognized the independence of the United States on September 3, 1783.
This of course made Lower Canada a poorer place. The next blow to Lower Canada’s fortunes was the construction of the Erie Canal. Built between 1817 and 1825, the Erie Canal traversed 363 miles from Albany to Buffalo. The canal enabled traders and settlers to bypass the St Lawrence lowlands further reducing incomes in Lower Canada.
The elites in Canada East did not want to be annexed by the United States. So they stuck with being loosely governed by Great Britain. It was foreseen that the rapidly expanding United States would no doubt annex Canada’s territories in the west unless something was done to prevent it.
There was a small window of opportunity; the United States was engaged in their Civil War and was distracted by it. The solution was seen as necessary; a railroad from the Pacific to the Atlantic! But meant a more formal relationship within what remained of British North America. If Canada East was going to resist being a small island surrounded by the United States something had to be done.
A railroad would secure east west trade for Lower Canada most definitely; railroads were a tremendously expensive capital project. Only a nation of substance had the required collateral. After much back and forth between Quebec City and London, Canada was born. The elites in Quebec discovered their sovereignty was diluted even further.
Investors are one thing, but railroads don’t get built without know how, or manpower. The Scots supplied the know how, and the Irish supplied the man power. In fact the English were not a factor as regards immigration. But blaming the Anglos became a meme in Quebec continuing still in Quebec.
In 1867 Canada became a federation. Which is a different legal entity than a confederation. Over time the balance of power in Canada changed, especially with the admission of the western provinces. Pierre Trudeau, in essence representing the powerful elite in Quebec, rather than Canadas other provinces, needed an instrument of some kind to restore French Quebec power in Canada.
So a great hullabaloo was raised in the land. People across Canada thought it about time Canadas constitution rested in Ottawa rather than in London. This was the pretext; the real aim, was the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Quebec has yet to sign the repatriated constitution as was promised. But Pierre Trudeau wasted no time in using the Charter to remake Canada. Insisting the everyone in Canada should be bilingual if they expected to participate in running the country henceforth was celebrated across the land. The poor fools outside of Quebec had no idea that they had agreed to a constitutional amendment, de facto, when the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was made the cornerstone of restoring French power in Canada.
However given that Canada is a federation the provinces have rights only Quebec had made use of up until now. Of course Justin Trudeau and the Liberal party will do everything possible to resist the provinces asserting their constitutional rights; but those rights were imbedded in the original structure at Confederation because at the time a federation suited the aims of what became Quebec.
Of course Justin Trudeau has continued the politics of division began especially by his father Pierre Trudeau. The provinces in concert have agency they have yet to thoroughly explore or exploit.
The premiers ought make the restoration of Parliament their first order of business. The prime minister is one man. Canadas future should not be decided by the prime minister. He has been appropriating power he does not rightfully have. He is not a president or a king.
If Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, decided to build a deep water port on Hudson’s Bay and ship their resources to buyers elsewhere in the world; then do it. Instead of typically bending a knee to some New World Order initiative — crafted elsewhere — Canadians’ have a means of resisting those who would off shore Canadas sovereignty.
The 1982 amendments to th Constitution Act 1867, explicitly recognized provinces’ and territories’ constitutional rights to manage their own non-renewable natural resources, forestry resources, and electrical energy. This includes the power to levy mining taxes and royalties.
I’d guess that certain powers over resource development are enjoyed by Quebec, as a precedent, that the other provinces and the territories are denied.
Concluding; the provinces have been intentionally divided against one another by certain Prime Ministers. The respective premiers should meet and hammer out an agreement of mutually agreed upon strategies they have in common which they are constitutionally empowered to deploy.
Prime Minister Trudeau has chosen to assume a dictatorial role he is not entitled to assume. The provincial premiers represent the people whom elect them and cow towing to the Prime Minister the way they have is an abdication of their responsibilities. Read the Constitution.