Behind Trudeau's "Liberal" Agenda Lies A Calculated Transition To Communism

“Under the guise of promoting 'generational fairness,' Trudeau's rhetoric sounds more like a socialist seeking to foment class-based warfare to pit Canadians against each other.”

“You talk to an older generation of folks and they say, 'Oh no, I remember I had to scrimp and save for years before we could set a down payment on a home. It was really hard. It was a big expense. Housing is always hard. No, you didn’t," stated PM Justin Trudeau in his latest piece of verbal pretension.

Reflecting on this statement speaks to the pompous nature of Canada's prime minister. Who is this man-- or any other-- to pass judgement on individual financial circumstances of tens of millions of "Old Stock" Canadian citizens?

Trudeau is a silver spoon-fed rich kid from Quebec who has never struggled financially in his life. The idea that he speaks from experience is laughable. Our PM speaks not as if his role is to manage our economy, but rather that, being a Trudeau-family member, he has the right to own our economy.

Such an inclination may not be as outrageous as it appears. A recent article from American independent media outlet LifeSite speaks to the issue:

“Trudeau Wants To Usher In Socialism Under The Guise Of ‘Generational Fairness’”

Based on the headline, one can immediately assume the news source to be non-Canadian. CBC, CTV, Toronto Star, Globe & Mail do not write in this manner. So much of what underlies Trudeau's political orientation has been obscured by the press. Namely, his socialist,  Marxist-derived political orientation.

“Under the guise of promoting 'generational fairness,' Trudeau's rhetoric sounds more like a socialist seeking to foment class-based warfare to pit Canadians against each other.”

Exactly correct this is, as obfuscated by our Liberal government's paid-off media sources. In terms of socialist dogma, we reference the "class-based warfare" element of the equation:

The basic tenets of Marxist philosophy include the following: dialectical materialism, historical materialism, class struggle, revolution, dictatorship and finally, communism.

"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently suggested that Canadian homeowners have 'too much house' and should move out, under the guise of generational fairness.” 

We stand witness as the PM adheres to a fundamental of socialist ideology, in this instance through a branding of "class conflict" in Canada. We pick up on a related social circumstance. Liberal government decision-making has led directly toward two pertinent economic circumstances. First, lack of home affordability. Secondly, the fact that federal immigration policy has resulted in extreme housing shortages.

In terms of socialism, a lack of private home ownership exists as a fundamental. Founder of communism Karl Marx stated that "the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property."

In this regard, it's critical to be aware of Marxism's socialist continuum. Theorists put forth that "conversion" to a socialist state follow a specific trajectory:

"According to Marx's theory of historical materialism, societies pass through six stages — primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and finally global, stateless communism."

Right. At this point in Canada's socio-political timeline, we stand at the capitalism stage. Nine years of Trudeau's Liberals have seen society incrementally pushed toward the socialist stage. Beyond the issue of private property, signs along the socialist pathway come clear. Or they would have-- if not for obfuscation by media.

Class warfare is critical to the agenda, yet it doesn't exist as a singular piece of weaponry. Let us consider the extent of social "warfare" during the Trudeau years. During this time period, the issue of race-relations has been elevated by government to the top of the Canadian totem pole.

We uncover our second example of "silent warfare" as advanced by the Liberals. First, the traditional element pertaining to class. Next, an advancement of ethno-religious conflict. The formula is not all that complicated. For the purpose of fragmentation, simply import millions of new arrivals from disparate nations of the world.

When values inevitably begin to clash, attribute the results to racism, bigotry and xenophobia on the part of the "host" society. The result is social division, which exists as another tenet of Marxist philosophy, exemplified in the term "divide and conquer."  

Which form of society is more easily seduced? A united, cohesive Canadian population, or one in which anger and resentment run rampant? What type of nation is more vulnerable to social revolution-- one in which social cohesion rules the day, or one in which identifiable communities spend so much energy bickering amongst themselves they forget who the real enemy is?

Classic Marxist ideology it is. Which brings us to the "post-modern" component of Justin Trudeau's "Woke Revolution." Back in the day, when social philosophies espoused by Lenin, Stalin and Mao were in vogue, the concept of "gender" conflict was near non-existent.

Contemporary socialism has other ideas. Utilizing race-conflict as a launching pad, the neo-socialists add sexuality and gender to the agenda. Today, the art-of-the-deal can be found in gender conflict; in tangible terms, the rise of the LGBT movement.

Who more than Justin Trudeau has gone hog-wild over this post-modern element of the equation? Let us introduce our latest "persecuted class"-- homosexuals and transexuals. Bumping up the "victim card" rhetoric, we see this play out daily in society. What percentage of Canadians are transgendered? Why, this would be a whopping 1% at best. Degree to which social conflict emanates as a result? It's bloody well over-the-moon.

Underlying every bit of this is the "globalist imperative." Wokism is the new communism, and Justin Trudeau is the King of Wokism in Canada.

Which brings us to Canadian media, and the role they are playing in Canada's political seduction. Ever witness mainstream media outlets allude to the historical trajectory aspect of which we speak? How often have you read articles which elucidate Canada's historical continuum or comment on "where we have been, where we are now, and where we are going in the future."

It never occurs. Let us look to media projections on the condition of Canadian society in the future. They never happen, because Trudeau and the Liberals do not want it to happen. They much prefer that average Canadians have not a clue as to our step-by-step conversion from capitalism to communism.

Thus, the "silent" revolution that Justin Trudeau was installed to perpetrate on an unsuspecting Canadian society.