Former Immigration Minister Speaks Of Trudeau's Terrorist Vetting Negligence

“As we have all observed, our current government has not been heeding national security advice and has not been vigilant on these issues over the past nine years.”

"Significant questions are being asked of Canada’s security and immigrant vetting processes following the arrests last month of Ahmed Fouad Mostafa Eldidi, 62, and Mostafa Eldidi, 26, a father and son facing charges that include conspiracy to commit murder for the benefit or at the direction of a terrorist group—in this case, ISIS."

Such is the state of PM Justin Trudeau's "post-modern" society. Let us not delude ourselves. Despite ubiquitous refusal from mainstream media to hold immigration policy accountable for social degeneration, citizens with common sense see the writing on the wall.

The press in Canada love to rant about "racism" existing as the core cause of social consternation. The accusation is unfounded. The true culprit is immigration intake-- its rapid pace, the quantities, and, of course, the poor vetting that results from the Liberal's "too much too fast" policy.

"Reports have emerged that the pair were able to immigrate to Canada despite the elder Eldidi having participated in violence, including torture and dismemberment, against an ISIS prisoner."

Former Conservative Immigration Minister Chris Alexander-- an individual who has seen the situation from the inside, addressed these issues in a recent interview:

“Over the decades we have failed on several fronts. One example is the number of Iranian and Syrian regime officials—some with allegations of having committed terrible crimes in those countries—who somehow slipped through our vetting system.

"But the main challenge today is that the number of threats—from terrorist and criminal groups, as well as hostile foreign states—has grown significantly while our national security capabilities have failed to keep pace.”

Let us consider the takeaway: our Liberal government's implementation of the highest immigration quotas of the past 100 years has resulted in a "failure to keep pace" in terms of preventing "hostile foreign agents" from entering our country.

Media address certain issues, while eschewing others. Nothing unusual there. What concerns Cultural Action Party [est.2016] in particular is how Canadian media consistently shy away from "root causes."

For instance, why is PM Trudeau so insistent upon rushing immigration intake to the degree that national security has been jeopardized? Ever witness CBC or Globe & Mail address this? More macabre is that the Liberals understand the negative spin-off effect of mass immigration from Middle Eastern nations, yet permit it regardless.

What are these incompetent Liberals up to anyway? Is their mandate management of a western democracy, or rather, it this a situation unique in Canadian history? As in, Team Trudeau are really in the business of national transformation. Could their seeds for  sowing a covert "socialist revolution" found in the following:

1. Overwhelm the country with migrants, inclusive of those who wish to inflict damage on society.

2. When Canadians have difficulty adjusting to the rapid pace of national transformation, brand the culprits racists and bigots.

3. Utilize the behaviour of these citizens to justify an infringement of individual rights, impediment on freedom of speech, and various other punitive actions.

In this regard, we come to understand why one by-product of the agenda stands so tall. That ticket is "Islamophobia" and its permutations. Despite calculated media sublimation, many Canadians are aware of the riots which have recently unfolded in the U.K.

Branded "anti-Islam" in nature, freshly-minted British PM Keir Starmer is being pushed to create an official definition of "Islamophobia." One could argue that to do so inches British society toward an implementation of religious "blasphemy laws," standard among theocratic countries of the Middle East.

Back to ex-immigration minister of Canada, Chris Alexander:

“As we have all observed to our dismay, our current government has not been heeding national security advice and, to put it very mildly, has not been vigilant on these issues over the past nine years.”

Nine years? Holy Cow-- Justin Trudeau has been PM for the past nine years--what a coincidence, eh? Is Canada's "woke one," in fact, desirous of such a thing? It may not be as crazy as many may imagine. Does it not appear factual that from day one, Trudeau's prime ministership has evinced a "calculated" or pre-conceived dynamic? Is it madness to state that our current Liberal government has from the beginning felt as if it is driven by forces beyond our national borders?

"My guess[Chris Alexander] is that those responsible for these issues have been run ragged in recent years."

Trans-lation: the volume of immigrants has resulted an ability for "hostile foreign actors"-- aka potential criminals and terrorists-- to easily pop into Canada to carry out their "affairs."

"We need to put sound national security practices back at the centre of our immigration policy—as well as our policy across government. In a world where all categories of threat actors are looking for the line of least resistance worldwide to launder money, move operatives, recruit new supporters, and disrupt democracy, Canada has become an easy mark in recent years." 

If so, Canada may be able to avoid this:

"Conservative MPs are calling on the House public safety committee to investigate the case of a father and son in Toronto charged with multiple terrorism-related offences."

"A charge sheet does allege that Ahmad Fouad Mostafa Eldidi committed an aggravated assault for the benefit of the Islamic State in 2015 somewhere outside of Canada, but doesn't offer further details."

What a shock that is. Did Justin Trudeau just transition Canada to a terrorist-conducive society? If so, it should be no surprise. Predecessor Pierre Trudeau evinced the same form of arrogance. It's a Trudeau-family habit: infused with presumption, they assume to know what’s best for Canadians.

"We need to restore our reputation for a best-in-class immigration and refugee programmes rooted in sound, reliable national security vetting."

A Liberal government failure.

"We  need to harden our defences, increase our military spending, and upgrade and broaden our national security capabilities to protect Canadians in general as well as the integrity of our immigration and refugee determination system at a time when hostile state and non-state actors have become more hostile almost across the board."

A Liberal government failure.

Still, the question remains as to why this situation exists. Random, or calculated? As the behest of international forces such World Economic Forum and World Sikh Organization? As payback to the government of China for elevating Trudeau's to the PMO, and keeping him there?

Why, why, why?

In this regard, one thing appears to be in place on a permanent basis. Canadian media may deliver some details, but across the board, they refuse to address reasons why.