How Pierre Trudeau Set Up The Fall Of English Canada

Ostensibly for purposes of advancing civil rights, the subtext of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has never been properly exposed.

In the spring of the year 2000, a small book with major implications for Canada appeared on the market. Authored by academics F.L. Morton and Rainer Knopff, the ‘Charter Revolution and The Court Party' exists in extreme contrast to traditional thought on Charter Rights in Canada.

"The Charter of Rights has transformed Canadian politics. The Supreme Court has used the Charter to change government policy on an ever-expanding list of controversial issues— abortion, aboriginal rights, gay rights, bilingualism, criminal law enforcement, and prisoner-voting."

Controversy over the Charter is tricky business. Ostensibly for purposes of advancing civil rights, the subtext of its contents has never been properly exposed.

It was in 1982 that former PM Pierre Trudeau conceded to Canadian Premiers dubious of the Charter's social implications. For the purpose of appeasement, Trudeau approved an addition of Section 33, also known as the "Notwithstanding Clause." Functioning as a five-year buffer to override contents, Canada's liberal-leftist contingent have been running down its inclusion for the past 50 years.

Cultural Action Party[est. 2016] can understand why. Implicit in the Charter is the foundation alluded to in the word "revolution." From day one, Charter Rights contained potential to turn Canada "inside out." Over a half-century of existence, it’s exactly what transpired.

As applied to society, Charter rights exist as a weapon of legal and political empowerment for Canada’s “special interest” communities. Those who most effectively utilize its essence, win. Since its inception, the Charter has created a tsunami of power for “woke” leftist politicians and 3rd world political interests.

"The Court has made itself the second most powerful institution in Canadian politics after the Federal Cabinet."

"Morton and Knopff demonstrate that the Court is not so much the cause as the means by which the ‘Charter' Revolution’ has been achieved."

Ever wonder, for example, why Transgenderism moved to the forefront of political issues in our country? The Charter is one reason[money is the other] why the LGBT industry wields so much political power in contemporary Canada.

Or how a father from the Sikh-Canadian community, comprising a mere two percent of our population, managed to gain approval for his son to carry a kirpan(knife) while attending high school in Ontario?

The Charter is the reason why. Media have never said so, but its contents transferred socio-political power out of the hands of the majority-- a staple of democracy-- and into a condition whereby, in basic terms, the minority maintain the ability to push around the majority.

The Charter is pure Pierre Trudeau. More than any historical political figure, it was this prototype globalist who threw Canadian society off its democratic axis.

How he did so is poorly understood. In addition to facilitating China’s penetration of our country, Trudeau Sr. played a pivotal role in opening the doors to mass immigration from the 3rd world. So much so that within one generation, Anglophones in Canada will transition to a minority community.

The elder Trudeau founded Canadian multiculturalism, arguably the greatest game-changer in national history. Cancelling our bi-cultural English and French-Canadian identity, PET created a path for so-called "minorities" to gain political power traditionally held by our founding settler communities.

In this regard, one must keep in mind the "long game." We note how legacy media consistently shy away from such activities. What will the demographic composition of Canada look like in 2044? How much time is it going to take for white Canadians to take their place as one of a plethora of "minority" communities?

Total silence from media-- for a reason. CBC, CTV, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star-- they're all in on the game, as funded by our current Liberal government.

"Our primary objection to the Charter Revolution is that it is deeply and fundamentally undemocratic, not just in the simple and obvious sense of being anti-majoritarian, but also in the more serious sense of eroding the habits and temperament of representative democracy."

Morton and Knopff knock the anti-democratic ball out of the park. "Anti-majoritarian" being the bat by which they do so. As applied in society, the Charter serves as a woke lighting rod of special interest community power accumulation.

Another fundamental the academics speak of is no less crucial: a calculated transition of power away from Parliament, and into the hands of court judges, lawyers, immigration lobbyists and ethnic not-for-profit groups.

"Behind the judges is a well orchestrated network of state-funded interest groups that use litigation and the media to achieve what they can't win through democratic elections."

Exactly as the woke liberal doctor ordered. Fifty-years on, these special interest groups hold more power than the general voting public. As an example, organizations such as National Council of Muslim Canadians enjoy the privilege of a connection to the PMO that no collective of generic citizens could hope to gain.

By way of Charter Rights, leftist lawyer Pierre Trudeau empowered "his kind” by transitioning power away from individual Members of Parliament. In an instant, the leftist orientation of our legal system was super-charged. Billable hours for lawyers went through the roof.

Examples of Charter-Related Cases

R. v. Big M Drug Mart, [1985] 1 SCR 295

"Big M Drug Mart was a store in Calgary that did not close on Sundays. The police charged the store for violating the Lord’s Day Act, which stated that selling goods or conducting business on Sundays was unlawful. The act reflected the Christian tradition of reserving Sunday as a day of rest."

"The Supreme Court decided that the act violated the fundamental freedoms of religion protected by the Charter. This is because the act forced everyone in Canada to observe the rules of one religion (Christianity), which limited the freedom of religion of those who did not share the same beliefs or practices."

A Jew, Muslim and a Non-Believer File Lawsuit In 1985 Under The Charter of Rights

"Philip Zylberberg and two other Sudbury parents won a decision saying the reciting of the prayer — and non-Christian children opting out by sitting in the hallway — violated the Charter of Rights."

"Three years later, in September 1988, they won a decision against the Sudbury school board which had the Lord's Prayer removed from all Ontario public schools."

We stand witness as the majority religion in Canada gets pushed around via Charter Rights. Upon which we offer a caveat. The point here is not about one particular religion being superior to others. What we are exposing is a tangible example of how lawyers utilize Charter Rights to empower the minority, and disempower the majority.

Expanding the concept to general society, we come to understand the reason why so-called "minorities" wield the power they do. We comprehend how the LGBT movement came to prominence. How transgenderism transitioned to a core social issue.

Add to it the phenomenon of "Islamophobia," and the empowerment of a community representing 5% of our population. Abortion-mongering?  See Trudeau, Pierre and his Charter. Euthanasia-pushing? Check Justin Trudeau, founder of systemic assisted dying in Canada.

But for our money, the biggest injustice of all is found in the Charter's role in the marginalization of English Canada, and its Anglophone population. Pierre Trudeau was Quebecois. What did he care about an erosion of society outside of Quebec? Not a shred is our take on the matter.

Decades later, along comes another Quebecois PM, Justin Trudeau, who in terms of an assault on English Canada, is even more extreme than so-called father. Branded racist and homophobic by PM Justin Trudeau, Anglophones in Canada are under the grip of major socio-political disempowerment.

The weaponry being a Trudeau-family specialty. Mass immigration, Multiculturalism, Charter Rights and the "Court Party" that followed in its wake.

Fifty years from its implementation, not once has establishment media breathed a word regarding the Charter's negative impact on democracy in Canada.

In CAP’s books, that’s what we call a “crime.”