Immigration Results In Mass Rioting In Britain--Could It Come To Canada?
"Police are preparing to respond to more than 100 planned far-right gatherings and dozens of counter-protests in what is feared could be the 'busiest day' of the UK riots so far."
Countless media reports exist on the severity of anti-immigration riots presently occurring in the U.K. Meanwhile, endless sublimation of the extremity of the chaos emanates from mainstream media in Canada.
Sure, there has been sporadic reporting from National Post, Toronto Star as well as several small-market publications. Based on PM Justin Trudeau's declaration to pay 35% of journalist salaries, no thinking Canadian should be surprised at the outcome.
In basic terms, the Liberal government of Canada do not want Canadians catching wind of the degree of anger emanating in British society. Presumably, it has been implemented for the purpose of minimizing any form of replication of protests on Canadian soil.
"Police are preparing to respond to more than 100 planned far-right gatherings and dozens of counter-protests in what is feared could be the 'busiest day' of the UK riots so far."
"Gatherings are anticipated in 41 of the 43 police force areas across England and Wales with officers based in London and the South East redeployed to northern towns and cities, the PA News Agency has reported."
"It comes amid fears dozens of addresses for immigration lawyers, refugee shelters and charities could be targeted following a 'hit-list' of 39 locations, while 6,000 officers are on stand-by to respond to thugs."
While much of this qualifies as “breaking news,” clear-thinking Canadians should already be sick of the spin. Is it really the case that 100% of those involved in the protests qualify as “thugs?" Do you believe it to be impossible that a significant percentage are simply in favour of a moratorium on immigration intake? Anyone else notice that throughout the entire spectacle, media never suggest that-- gulp-- the problem is to be found in immigration policy itself?
A recent poll in Canada reveals that 60% of those queried believe "immigration levels in our country are too high." Does this make them thugs? Add to it the tedious “far-right” label ubiquitously injected into press articles. Is every single citizen opposed to mass immigration from the Middle East by default a member of the “far-right?”
Racism, or Protectionism? Feeling thoroughly threatened in terms of cultural appropriation, millions of Britons likely wish to preserve their national identity. Despite wishful thinking on the part of government and media, this is not racism.
Unfortunately, media refuse to entertain such concepts. Milking the "Islamophobia" ticket as if there's no tomorrow, PM Keir Starmer shows his true colours as a Trudeau-clone.
After the fall of Emmanuel Macron in France, Angela Merkel in Germany, Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand, patriots might have believed the destructive seeds of the woke globalist imperative have receded. Not so in England, as PM Starmer prepares to wage war against "the people."
"British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said sufficient police would be on the streets to handle anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant riots in the coming days as he sought to reassure communities braced for more violent protests."
We step back to explore the situation at a high-level. The basic issue being a battle of wills between government and the people. What does the dynamic tell us about the degree of democratic governance in western nations? Why is it that media refuse to explore this in any detail?
“The word democracy comes from the Greek words 'demos', meaning people, and 'kratos' meaning power; so democracy can be thought of as "power of the people": a way of governing which depends on the will of the people.”
“No one has shaped the way we look at voting more than Jean-Jacques Rousseau(1712-1778). He wrote his most influential work, The Social Contract, a little more than a decade before the American Revolution.”
“Rousseau immortalized the concept of the 'will of the people.' He described a society governed by the people rather than a central authority.”
Cultural Action Party [est.2016] cut to the chase: to apply this to the current social conflict in England is a sad joke. Sadder still is to apply the principle to the state of Canadian society. Let's face it-- our country has been hi-jacked. "Public will," or "will of the majority" means bupkis to Justin Trudeau. In truth, he has spent most of his nine years in office doing the opposite of the will of Canadians.
Head count on the quantity of legacy media articles which reflect this truism? Begin at zero, and continue until you get to nothing.
Message to the globalist gods above: your immigration imperative from on-high is damaging western nations. But you don't care. Pourquoi? Can it be that international forces of wokism are, in fact, desirous of socio-political breakdown? If so, does the dynamic not qualify as a form of revolution, more aptly titled "socialist revolutions?"
Here, we get to the heart of the matter. From day one, CAP has considered Justin Trudeau nothing more than a "socialist revolutionary" prancing about in woke Bollywood clothing.
In the meantime, over it Britain, it's all about Islam and their troubles within western society. The catalyst being a triple-murder of innocent white children at the hands of the son of a Rwandan immigrant. On this basis, Britons should be outraged-- not that violence toward the innocent should be condoned.
Yet, as referenced in a previous article, CAP point to a glaring, yet overlooked, piece of hypocrisy resulting from social chaos in the U.K.:
Not once have media referenced the idea that a black teen murdering white children constitutes a hate crime. In this we discover the insidious agenda entrenched within western media.
Trudeau reports to a higher authority — not a deity — but to those whose power resides in various international fora, like the IMF, the World Bank, the Bank for International Settlements, the WHO, the corrupt United Nations, NATO, various think tanks, Corporate head offices and etc.
These are run by a vast bureaucracy of unelected bureaucrats and the unelected heads of these entities. None of these people are elected. But you can bet your taxes and mine support these behemoths.
Elections mean not a thing. Politicians run on platforms of lies. All of their pledges and promises are meaningless. The ballot box means nothing. In some jurisdictions the systems are electronic and mightily susceptible to fraud — which used to be called ballot stuffing.
If these powers refuse to acknowledge the disaster some of their policies so obviously are and if they refuse to acknowledge the voters they can only expect more riots and
and increasing protests.
Protestors and rioters are voting with increasing frequency. Not at the ballot box but with violence.
These deep state enterprises are run by people who hate violence when they are on the end of the bricks but have no problem appropriating violence for their own ends.
Ii will indeed come to Canada unless we change the path that we are on.