Multicultural Awareness Month Neglects Damage To Anglo-Canadians

To what extent has multiculturalism and related "diversity" provided benefit for Canadians of European heritage?

As some readers may be aware of, Multicultural Awareness Month comes to Canada during the month of October.

A National Post article published this week alludes to a piece of reality poorly understood by general society. There are so many monthly tributes to Canada's "minority" and special interest communities that the phenomenon is too common for its own good. 

October also happens to be Islamic Heritage Month(non-existent), in addition to Women's Heritage Month(existent). Canadians are also benefactors of Tamil Heritage Month, Bangladeshi Heritage Month, and several other attempts to fulfill Pierre Trudeau's original vision for multicultural society established in the early 1970s.

For CAP, what Pierre Trudeau truly envisioned for Canada through enforced "diversity" policy in entirely suspect. We point to what is arguably the most ironic element of the agenda.

The community which has most contributed to national heritage has been omitted from the Multicultural banquet feast. Cultural Action Party speak of the influence of Anglophone heritage on society. Truth is, just about all fundamentals of Canadian governance are rooted in English, Scottish or Irish heritage.

We are not speaking of some fringe component. Rather, we speak of fundamentals such as democratic process, law, court system, jurisprudence, right to fair trial, parliamentary process and much more.

Number of days dedicated to acknowledgement of these contributions? You guessed -- zero is the answer. Number of occasions in which mainstream media has referenced the fact? That would be zero as well.

A perfect microcosm it is. Why would it be that, for example, Tamil History Month is recognized, while English History Month fails to register on political richter scale?

Permit CAP to expand on the notion. Not only is government shunning Anglo-European historical contribution to our country. In the name of Multiculturalism, something more profound has taken place.

Jocularly referred to as "the running of the Anglophone," institutional Canada-- government, media, academia-- have a giant hate-on for the Anglo element of society. As prime minister, Justin Trudeau has spent several years running down these communities. Branding them bigoted and racist, their reputation became tainted with political animus.

Among those responsible for the corralling of the communities into the malignant citizen category, two figures stand out as leaders of the pack. One is Justin Trudeau, the other New Democratic Party leader, Jagmeet Singh.

Both have branded Canada genocidal. Both men have publicly claimed that society is infused with "systemic" racism. How much enlightenment does it take to recognize a basic truth? Neither of these politicians care for our "Old Stock" communities.

Upon which we ratchet up our claims. Not only does government ignore Anglophone contributions to Canada. Not only have federal party leaders branded these folks bigoted racists.

Fact is, PM Justin Trudeau has never--as in not once-- verbally referenced Anglophone-Canadians, or even used the word English Canada in public.

Is all this not ominous as heck? The Trudeau-Singh woke political parade is eerily reminiscent of historical communities who have been set up for a fall. Silence is golden, don't you know.

Within a single generation, white Canadians will transition to a minority community. Media say nothing. As a simple exercise, we took a gander at the names of publishers, editors and top journalists at CBC, CTV, Global News, Toronto Star, Toronto Sun, Globe & Mail and other leading media outlets.

Almost without exception, all derive from an Old Stock background, be it Anglophone or Francophone. You tell CAP: why, within this structure, is the fate of our Anglophone communities disregarded in totality?

One good reason is found in Pierre Trudeau's enforcement of Multiculturalism on society. Here's a question never once posited by any media organization in Canada:

To what extent has Multiculturalism and related "diversity" provided benefit for Canadians of European heritage?

Quick Answer: nothing at all. All the benefit goes toward Justin Trudeau's preferred form of citizens. 3rd World immigrants, refugees from so-called "developing nations," multicultural non-profit groups such as National Council of Canadian Muslims.

There's a benefit for Sikh-Canadians, Chinese-Canadians, Hindus, Gays, Blacks, Transgendered, First Nations, Tamil Tigers and the poor from Bangladesh.

As for descendants of the founders of our nation, their collective benefit amounts to a giant goose egg. Not once has any of these ideas been entertained by "intellectual" professors at Canadian universities. No politician of any stripe has considered the concept, nor has media.

What to conclude? CAP will go first: Multiculturalism has been, and will continue to be, the worst thing that ever happened to Canadians of European origin. Founded by  Quebecois communist Pierre Trudeau, the plight of the Anglophone has gone undetected for the past 60 years.

Media never speculate on its success. Nor do they reference a critical fact. Of some 200 nations on planet earth, Canada is alone in terms of legislated, institutional Multiculturalism.

Fact or not fact: media has for the past 60 years depicted Multiculturalism as being as natural as winter snow in Nunavut. Have our communities been hosed in a most damaging manner?

Absolutely. If any aspect of the multicultural-diversity agenda should have major awareness among Canadians, this is the one.