Pierre Trudeau, Founder Of Sikh-Khalistan Politics In Canada

Our Liberal government support nationalism as applied to foreign nations, while despising it when applied to Canada.

"The current rift with the Modi government has roots that go back decades, when then-prime minister Pierre Trudeau faced criticism from India that Canada was too soft on the Khalistani issue in the 1980s." 

It's an element of our history that Canadians should comprehend in full. While mainstream media elaborate on current scandals emanating from Canada-India relations, core components remain peripheral.

We take note of parallels with media positioning on Canada-China relations. CBC, CTV, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star are willing to inform news consumers of  catastrophes in terms of alleged federal election interference. Conveniently, they omit root causes of for the debacle.

Former Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau is the founder of the integration of China into the fabric of Canadian society. Turns out it’s also true in terms of Punjabi presence in our country:

"The conflict over Khalistan dates back to 1982, when Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi expressed concerns to Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, Justin Trudeau’s father, regarding Canada’s leniency towards Khalistan supporters."

"At the time, Surjan Singh Gill, a Khalistan activist, had established a Khalistan government in exile in Vancouver, issuing symbolic passports and currency."

"The Liberal government led by Pierre Trudeau refused to extradite Talwinder Singh Parmar, accused of murdering two Indian police officers, further. Parmar would later be implicated as a mastermind behind the 1985 Air India bombing, one of the deadliest terror attacks in aviation history."

Fascinating it is to note that, relative to the extremity of the crime, the Air India bombing has never taken its rightful place as a pivotal piece of Canadian history. While the current incarnation of a Liberal government panders to ethnic voters regarding historical tragedies, this one conveniently fails to make the grade.

"The roots of this diplomatic rift can be traced back to Justin Trudeau's father, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, who also faced challenges in relations with India."

“The meek Canadian response to the Khalistani challenge was a frequent target of Indian politicians as far back as 1982, when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi complained about it to Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau."

Upon which Cultural Action Party [est.2016] contemplate the situation in a high-level context. What is it about the Liberal Party and Trudeau-family prime ministers that pushes them toward an "internationalization" of our country? Trudeau Sr. imported China and the Punjab, while Justin Trudeau imported the Middle East.

Are these developments simply a manifestation of "multiculturalism" that PET forced on Canadian society? Perhaps something along the lines of the following hypothetical:

"First, we cancel English & French Canadian identity. Next, with no approval from citizens, we transition Canada to a 'multicultural' society. We follow this up by importing millions of migrants from China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Punjab etc. Eventually, Canada's 3rd World contingent will become so plentiful that the 'host' population will be superseded by new arrival communities."

As reported by journalist Douglas Todd in the Vancouver Sun, circa 2018:

"How did it get to this? Why do Canadian Sikhs punch so much above their weight? The country only has 500,000 Sikhs, accounting for a little more than one per cent[2018] of all Canadians."

"More than 12 per cent of federal Liberal cabinet ministers are Sikhs. There are 14 Liberal Sikh MPs, Liberals hold all nine federal ridings in which Punjabi Sikhs predominate, plus 11 more in which the South Asian population is significant."

Why are the Liberals like this? For what purpose did Pierre Trudeau set up Canada to lose its traditional identity and transition to an "international village" of 3rd World presence and power?

CAP can only guess as to the motivation, like this:

Firstly, from an ideological perspective, the Trudeau family are communists. The erasure of national sovereignty has existed as a cornerstone of Liberal government philosophy for the past half-century.

Secondly, the idea that the entire structure exists as an act of vengeance. According to contemporary "woke" philosophy, DEI, BIOPIC et al, innocent descendants of our original settler communities must suffer based on Canada's colonial legacy.

The colonialist imperative is what Justin Trudeau—like Pierre Trudeau before him— drives our PM to do what he does. The fact that the establishment of nations the family most admire[China, Cuba, former Soviet Union] are devoid of a colonialist foundation plays into this with perfection.

"During the 1980s, numerous militants sought refuge in Canada, including Talwinder Singh Parmar, a key figure in the Khalistani movement."

"Despite India's requests for his extradition, the Trudeau government did not act. The situation escalated tragically with the bombing of Air India Flight 182 (Kanishka) on June 23, 1985."

"Parmar, who had been protected by the Trudeau administration, was identified as the mastermind behind the attack."

Come on, feel the noise. What we have here is a case of bona fide coddling of what Canadian law might interpret as terrorism-driven mass murder. Trudeau Jr. on terrorism:

“The Liberal Party believes that terrorists should get to keep their Canadian citizenship ... because I do,” Trudeau told a Winnipeg town hall. “And I'm willing to take on anyone who disagrees with that.”

What to conclude, fellow patriots? Is it really a stretch to believe that the family Trudeau can accurately be certified as "terrorist-friendly?" How did it come to be that one family who provided two prime ministers for six terms in office are in fact, terrorist-supporting political leaders.

"On 23 June 1985, Air India Flight 182 from Montreal to Mumbai, disintegrated over the Atlantic Ocean as a result of an explosion from a bomb planted by Canada based Sikh terrorists and resulted in the deaths of 329 people."

"The Canadian government had been warned by the Indian R&AW about the possibility of terrorist attacks, and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service(CSIS) was accused of not acting on it. In his verdict, Justice Ian Josephson cited 'unacceptable negligence' by CSIS when evidence on the suspects and other informants were destroyed."

Was government motivation to import disgruntled Sikhs and Khalistan supporters to Canadian shores for political purposes? Why was all this so important to Pierre Trudeau?

"South Asian population in Canada grew from 7,000 in 1961 to 67,900 in 1971 and more than 200,000 South Asians came to Canada between 1971 and 1982, majority of them being of Indian origin."

Today, decades later, Sikh political power in Canada continues to grow. Upon election in 2015 our PM legalized weed, and then went to work for Sikhism, Punjab and Khalistan. Jagmeet Singh, leader of Canada's New Democratic Party and a vehement supporter of these causes, dwells in the same political landscape.

As such, an unrecognised irony exists at the baseline of the issues. Our Liberal government support nationalism as applied to foreign nations, while despising it when applied to Canada.

Obviously, the woke apple doesn't fall far from the communist tree.