Religious Fundamentalism Empowered As Canada, UK Appoint Top Legal Positions
“In July, 2024, Shabana Mahmood was sworn in as the first Muslim Lord Chancellor of the United Kingdom-- Ms. Mahmood swearing her oath on the Holy Quran.”
Current U.K. prime minister Keir Starmer and Canadian PM Justin Trudeau may not be siamese twins, yet one could easily argue that they are "joined at the hip."
It's with this idea in mind that interested parties can note the parallels. Both Britain and Canada have installed Muslim citizens as the top legal eagles in their respective countries. It's a curious phenomenon, made all the more fascinating by the fact that media in Canada have buried this critical development.
"In a historic ceremony at the Royal Courts of Justice, MP Shabana Mahmood was sworn in as the first female Muslim Lord Chancellor of the United Kingdom."
"The event marked a milestone in British history, with Ms Mahmood swearing her oath on the Holy Quran."
In these sentences can be discovered the changing tides of socio-political fortune within western democratic societies:
"By law, the Lord Chancellor is secretary of state for justice and the minister of the Crown responsible for the administration of the courts and legal aid in England and Wales."
In Canada, the equivalent position is held by Liberal Attorney General Arif Virani, who as an immigrant from Uganda, revealed his true colours in a controversial bureaucratic appointment last month. Like Virani, Birju Dattani is a Muslim migrant from Uganda.
“He brings a wealth of both professional and personal lived experience to this role,” Virani said.
Quite. Despite his elevation to a power-position as head of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, Dattani chose to resign from the post after he began to get bogged down in accusations of racism toward an identifiable community.
Across the pond, Britons have not been as fortunate.
"On 5 July 2024, Starmer appointed Mahmood as the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor. This made her the first Muslim Lord Chancellor in history.”
“In a 2024 interview with the The Sunday Times, Mahmood was described as a "devout Muslim". She said, "My faith is the centrepoint of my life.”
What does this situation portend for Britons? Like Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has a choice. It's one thing for myopic ethno-centrics to work their way into political power positions. It's quite another when national leaders of western nations knowingly facilitate such developments.
Why are they doing it?
"Islam is the second-largest religion in the United Kingdom, with results from the 2021 Census recording just under four million Muslims, or 6.0% of the total population in the United Kingdom."
Let us understand the scenario in terms of demography. 94% of the U.K. population do not adhere to Middle Eastern-derived religious fundamentalism. On this basis, why empower Shabana Mahmood to this extent? Perhaps Starmer should ask Justin Trudeau about it. After all, the Canadian prime minister has done the very same. In Canada, the percentage of the Muslim population currently stands at slightly under 5.0%.
Is there something Starmer and Trudeau know that is currently evading general society? Do these appointments align with changing tides of socio-political transformation?
If they do, we are not seeing it contemplated by western media. CBC, CTV, Globe & Mail, Toronto Star, et al. Not one of them placed a speck of editorial focus on the appointment of Mahmood to the top of the legal charts in the U.K.
Hot damn-- media must want what government want. Upon which a salient question bubbles to the surface: why do the controlling institutions of western society behave in this manner?
Does it not appear counterintuitive in terms of objective legal jurisprudence? Media won't breathe a word about it, but Sharia Law a fundamental belief system within the realm of Middle Eastern religiosity. Are the appointments of Shabana Mahmood and Arif Virani not conducive to an incremental step toward entrenchment of religious fundamentalist law within western nations?
Why, why, why? Sadly, citizens recieve no answers. It well appears that these political dynamics have become "the way of the western world." In the meantime, nations that adhere to Sharia Law-- Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan-- all major sources of immigration to Canada, show no sign of dilution at the hands of western political influence.
Are these developments the "sign of the times" in terms of socio-political transformation in western society? If they are, establishment media are taking a suspiciously casual approach to the development.
While our press hype the hell out of so-called racism, "Islamophobia" and such, they remain blank-as-a-post in terms of the socio-political trajectory among western nations.
Where we have been, where we are now, and most ominously, where we are going. Blindsided by the powers that be, concerned citizens stand helpless in the face of the woke assault on western society.
People are confused and think a foreign invasion is foreign tanks and military marching down the Blvd but today it is an invasion of foreign ideology military aged men flooding the country to overpower the existing population. Ants do it, bees do it, even educated fleas dot it!
This is where it begins. Immigration is often the wedge to bring in foreign ideologies and religions. Many of these are at odds with our freedoms and rule of law. Islam for istance is not compatible with other religions and ideologies. Peaceful nations should not have to surrender their ideals and laws to another religion or ideology.