The Post-Modern Malevolence Of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh

Surely there's more to New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh's motivation than securing a fat pension.

How a federal political party holding 7% of seats in the Canadian House of Commons became king-maker for their direct competitor is a political tale of great importance.

The dynamic obscured by Canadian media is worthy of a deep-dive into the rise of Jagmeet Singh as leader of Canada's New Democratic Party.

In a 2011 election, Jack Layton led the NDP to the most successful result in the party's history, winning 103 seats—enough for the party to form the Official Opposition.

Jagmeet Singh's predecessor, Thomas Mulcair, served as the leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) from 2012 to 2017.

Winning 44 seats in a 2015 federal election, Mulcair secured the second-best showing in party history. Successor Singh's leadership has resulted in the NDP currently holding 24 seats in the HOC.

According to the Federal Elections Act, a political party "must have at least 12 members in the House of Commons to be a 'recognized party' for the purposes of parliamentary proceedings."

Under the present circumstances, the downward trajectory of NDP party fortunes makes one wonder what the future holds. To say that Mr. Singh is presently "down in the mouth" would be a grave underestimation of present circumstances.

With an official election date inching closer to a one-year time-frame, Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre is becoming far more vocal regarding Singh's role as NDP leader:

"Canadians can't afford or even endure another year of this costly coalition. No one voted for you to keep Trudeau in power. You do not have a mandate to drag out his government another year," Poilievre wrote in a recent letter to the NDP leader.

A direct hit indeed, complete with multiple allusions. "No one voted you to keep Trudeau in power."

Translation: Circumvention of democratic jurisprudence, working against the will of the majority, acting as a turn-coat for your direct competition, serving as co-conspirator in the socio-political transformation of Canadian society.

The Liberal government is a failure on the environment,” Singh told the CBC in 2022.

Then why did you lock them into office for an additional three years, buddy-boy? It’s a question which can be applied to any and all of his criticism of the Trudeau government. Truth is, this fellow has always been a sketchy character in the world of Canadian politics.

Jagmeet Singh on Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro:

“He saw a country wracked by poverty, illiteracy & disease. So he lead a revolution that uplifted the lives of millions. RIP.”

In this he comes across as the long lost turban-clad brother of Justin Trudeau, whose admiration for the Cuban dictator Canadians have witnessed on multiple occasions.

As reported by CBC News, while running for office as an MP in a Vancouver suburb in 2019, his support was largely drawn from his home region of the Greater Toronto Area(white-minority riding Brampton, ON), which alone represented two-thirds of his fundraising.

Holy Cow. Who knew that community members in the Sikh political stronghold of Brampton (four Sikh MPs, one Muslim MP, no whites) care so deeply about election results 4000 km away in Vancouver, B.C.?

During the Covid era, the NDP Party leader had some harsh words for Canadian "vaccine rebels”:

“For employees who still refuse to be vaccinated, without a reason related to health status, we would expect that the collective agreement would be followed. All collective agreements include a process for progressive discipline – up to and including termination.”

Sounds like a Trudeau-clone to us. Upon which Cultural Action Party [est. 2015] make reference to another commonality: World Economic Forum, and it's woke agenda.

Jagmeet Singh is a WEF-affiliate. So is Trudeau, in addition to Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland, who also sits on their Board of Trustees.

Number of occasions Canadian media has referenced these facts? Try zero, and count backward from there.

We begin to piece together a puzzle that has remained unfinished since Jagmeet Singh took over as NDP Party leader in 2017. After which we pose a pertinent question:

Could it be that Jagmeet Singh was placed into office for a specific purpose? Our theory goes like this. Injecting a woke "back-up" into the political picture, the string-pullers create a "safety net" should Justin Trudeau's popularity begin to plummet. More macabre is the idea that globalist power players understood in advance that Trudeau would eventually flounder, his out-of-touch-with-common-Canadians character rendering it an inevitability.

Thus, ten years of Trudeau, locked-in for the purpose of a national reinvention of Canadian society. This is the part media never speak of. That Trudeau's tenure is unlike any other in the history of Canadian politics. CAP summarize with the term "woke revolution." Meaning that the political goal is not "management" of Canadian society, but rather "re-invention" of society.

Such a covert revolution contains seeds of social inversion. Traditional communities-- Anglophones, Christians and other multi-generational communities to the back of the woke bus, to be superceded by 3rd World Canadian “new arrival” communities.

And which communities qualify? What a shock it is that up top of the list is Jagmeet Singh's community, Sikh-Canadians. Is this the reason why this fellow signed a "confidence and supply" agreement with the Liberals?

Pundits claim that it's due to the NDP leader’s desire to receive a fat pension upon retirement, but there’s likely more to the political picture than this.