Trump, Trudeau And The Future Of Race-Relations In Canada

In Canada, Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are dance partners in advancement of the cult of identifiable community victimhood.

Though rarely positioned as such, the issue of race-relations is playing a prominent role in terms of voter preferences in North America-- far more than mainstream media care to admit, or expose.

While Canadian media focus on issues pertaining to economics, trade and tariffs, voter preferences based on racial-ethnic identity remains peripheral. An outlier arrives in the form of Canada's National Post:

‘Terry Glavin: Donald Trump Will Not Be The Leader Of The Free World’

"Although it wasn’t by a wide majority, most Americans had simply had it with the Biden-Harris Democrats. Out-of-control immigration, runaway inflation, a toleration of creepy “anti-Zionists” and Black Lives Matter insurrectionists, weird obsessions with race-and-gender quotas and transgendered men in women’s sports." 

Welcome to the world of Liberal government-brand "woke" ideology. Canadians too are fed up with these impositions. A critical element of the consternation remains unspoken. CAP speak of the rise of DEI, BIOPIC, CRT and all they entail within western society. Largely a product of educational initiatives, the topic of prejudice against white Canadians has begun to rear its head.

"Canadians have been sold a bill of goods,” says Bruce Pardy, the author of the report and a Queen’s University law professor.

“Many of them think that they have a right to equal treatment under the law. They think that discrimination is illegal. But nothing could be further from the truth. In Canada, discrimination is lawful as long as it is committed against the right groups — and in particular against straight white men.”

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau enjoys speaking of systemic racism in terms of its impact on racialized and so-called "minority" communities. An effective drill-down reveals that the "systemic" element actually applies to Anglophone communities. Conversely, DEI and such advance social equity for identifiable communities who fall outside the realm of white Canada.

“Equal treatment and equity are opposites,” writes Pardy, senior fellow with the Aristotle Foundation.

As an example, we turn to Toronto Metropolitan University[formerly Ryerson], who recently made an administrative decision to limit the intake of white medical school students to 25% of those accepted to the program.

Equity, or racism? If and when caucasian Canadians reach 25% of TMU medical school acceptance, further candidates will be excluded simply because they are white, heterosexual males.

You won't read about in Globe & Mail, or view it on CBC, but one politician has spoken about this in explicit terms-- pending President of the United States, Donald Trump:

"If Donald Trump is elected to a second term in November, his allies plan to end this country’s long-standing oppression of a major marginalized group in America: white people."

"Trump’s supporters inside and outside his campaign are making plans to use civil rights laws to counter what they perceive as ‘anti-white racism.’" 

In Canada, a country in which Anglophones are headed for minority status, Trump's pronouncement holds major implications. That is, if it actually occurs-- the hollowness of promises being ubiquitous within political rhetoric.

In the United States, ABC’s 'The View' co-host Sunny Hostin began crying the blues when directing her wrath toward white Americans as she "set her sights on voters that she described as “uneducated white women.”

“Black women tried to save this country again, last night … what we do not have is white women, who voted about 52% for Donald Trump — uneducated white women, is my understanding." 

A wonderful segue from the world of anti-white racism in Canadian universities and public education. Academia and the journalists they produce love to play the "uneducated white" race card. Between the lines, we recognize the associations. People like themselves-- the "educated" strata of society, enjoy stereotyping conservative voters as "uneducated meatheads."

Interesting how so few of these people reference the true nature of university education in Canada. Far too few of us recognize the extent to which schools and universities indulge in anti-Canadian sentiment. For decades, the "Marxist" imperative poured into academia, spawning by-products like Critical Race Theory, BIOPIC, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion[DEI] and other forms of thinly-veiled racism against Caucasians.

Toronto Star won't tweet it out, but this dynamic has contributed to an exacerbation of racial conflict in society. Another element comes in the form of Canadian governance, and those who call the shots:

“No matter the outcome of the US Elxn, let me say this: Hope is always better than fear and division. Tomorrow, we’ll be ready to stand up for Canada.”

--New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh 

Left unsaid is the idea that, along with PM Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh is as divisive as they come. Both politicians adhere to a classic piece of communist methodology:

"Accuse your enemy of that which you indulge in."

Trudeau was a bit more cagey in his commentary on the Trump victory, but any Canadian worth their salt knows where he's coming from. "Wokism," LGBT, mass immigration, illegal refugee intake, porous borders, erosion of national sovereignty, censorship of free speech, et al.

According to an article published this week by MSNBC, "Trump has become the head cheerleader for white victimhood." 

In Canada, Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are dance partners in promotion of the cult of community victimhood. Trudeau is the queen of the category, spending his first years in office apologizing to every non-white identifiable community he could get his hands on. As such, the "victim-card" transitioned to one of the most potent political weapons of our time. The result is a fragmented Canadian society:

"New federal data shows Canadians are more divided over record high immigration quotas due to concerns such as housing shortages and foreigners causing Canada to change in ways they don’t like.”

Hidden under a rock of media protectionism, we discover the following:

"Donald Trump vowed that if he is elected for a second term as president, he will pursue policies that will not allow what he calls a ‘definite anti-white feeling’ in the US."

It's a heavy claim, one which may or may not come to fruition. But it does deliver a timely message: the possibility that "whiteness" could enter the pantheon of race-relations within western society.

Our Liberal government of Canada loathe this kind of thing. Hence, it's sublimation within legacy media. The entire dynamic revealing a blatant hypocrisy which deserves to be understood by Canadians from all walks-of-life.

Racism can exist toward any identifiable community. To run around our country stating that there is "no such thing as racism against caucasians" is a falsehood. Times have changed, and will continue to do as Anglophones assume their position as one out of plethora of communities within our pluralist society.

The one-way street that arrives in the form of "white against non-white" exclusivity in terms of racist behaviour is a tired, tedious concept. If our Liberal government were truly "progressive” as they claim, they would progress toward an acceptance of these social realities.

“The ex-president was asked in a wide-ranging interview with Time Magazine  about polls showing that a majority of his supporters believe that anti-white racism poses a greater problem in America than anti-black racism.”

"Asked if he agreed, Trump replied, ‘Oh, I think that there is a lot to be said about that.'”

Count on complete silence on the topic from mainstream media in Canada.