Is The Liberal-NDP Coalition Willing To Ruin Canada To Stay In Power?

By way of our political leaders, Canada is being converted to an authoritarian society. Who better than China to push our country down the pre-conceived path?

In modern usage, the term 'Dictator' is used to describe a leader who holds or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power. 

According to Wikipedia, dictatorships are characterised by the following:

Suspension of civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergency; repression of political opponents; refusing to abide by rule of law, and an existence of a cult of personality centered on the leader."

Let us not get carried away in application of the criterea to current Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau. Our assessment is in no way an "all or nothing" scenario.

What we wish to emphasize is the degree to which the nation of China has affected a loss of freedom and democracy within Canadian society. As disseminated from China, the Covid pandemic becomes central to our analysis.

Suspension of civil liberties has resulted from the leveraging of the Covid fiasco, exemplified by government's response to the pandemic.

Proclamation of a state-of-emergency, by-product of Covid, is manifest in Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act.

Refusal to abide by rule-of-law comes from an intentional breach of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, again motivated by the pandemic.

Cult of Personality is Justin Trudeau. Lacking both substance as an individual and experience as a politician, the Liberal's has little choice but to fall back on Mr. Trudeau's "eco-saviour" globalist identity.

What can be seen in this scenario is not an instant transformation from democracy to dictatorship. Rather, what should be understood is the incremental nature of a preconceived agenda of political transformation.

Step-by-step-- as part of an historical continuum-- Canada is being converted to an authoritarian society. Who better than China to push our country down this pre-intended path?

It all fits; it makes good sense. Thus serving as motive number one for mainstream media to not utter a word about it. CAP has alluded to it on many occasions. A fundamental problem with our country is that we awaken to the damage years after the fact-- when little, if anything, can be done to prevent the outcome.

March 5th, 2023: 'Raymond J. de Souza: China Has Been Pulling Canada's Strings For Nearly Four Decades'

Presto. What should have been understood years ago-- what could have saved our country from the Liberal-Trudeau-China madness, goes untold. Pourquoi? It's not as if this is the first time such as dynamic as occurred. One could argue that the same "delay-tactic" principle applies to the following:

United Nations Refugee Convention(1951): 70 years later, Canada is responsible for the suffering people of the 3rd World-- not their own governments.

Points-Based Immigration Policy(1968): 55 years years beyond, Anglophone-Canadians are set up to transition to minority community status.

Multiculturalism(1971): 50 years later, astute Canadians recognize its damaging impact upon Anglophone and Christian communities.

Charter Of Rights and Freedoms(1982): 40 years down the road, racialized, religious and homosexual special interest groups rule the socio-political roost.

A common thread is woven. As far as Cultural Action Party[est. 2016] is concerned, the retroactive nature of these nation-changing dynamics can only exist if government and media are indelibly linked. How else could it transpire?

Out of this scenario, we draw a further conclusion. The damage from social policies created between 2015-2023 by Justin Trudeau will reveal themselves in decades to come.

Upon which we point to one recent development: a pact between Trudeau's Liberals and New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh.

CAP cannot over-emphasise the damage inherent in this development. While the Liberal-China election interference scandal evolves all around us, there is nothing that can be done to rid our nation of its pseudo-dictator.

What a crime it is-- or should be. Jagmeet Singh has done the greatest of disservice to citizens of Canada. Is it conspiratorial to state that this was pre-conceived as a measure of protection should the Liberal-China agenda go sideways?

Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are both World Economic Forum affiliates. Did someone high-up in their organization scheme up the Trudeau back-up plot to keep the globalist agenda rolling?

We have no proof one way or the other. What all this does say is that will take a tidal wave of social power to rid Canada of a malignancy inherent in a premeditated socialist seduction of our country.

Are Trudeau and Singh willing to sacrifice every remnant of individual freedom and democratic governance to keep their neo-authoritarian show on the road?