Nov 6, 2022·edited Nov 8, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg
Given the Quebec culture of Anglo hatred taught by the corrupt Catholic church from 1759 on, the answer to the question " Is Turd continuing to fight the Battle of the Plains of Abraham" is an emphatic YES. A bloodless genocide through mass immigration is part of the pogrom (not a typo). This means that this family and its associated cabal are de facto war criminals deserving of execution.
Two people that I knew several decades ago (one of these being J V Andrew , author of "Bilingual Today, French Tomorrow," "Backdoor Bilingualism," and "Enough!") were told by French Canadians; i. e., "frogs" that the British made two mistakes after the Conquest; viz., letting the frogs keep their language & religion and they wouldn't make that mistake when they took power.
All of this must get to Trump supporting Republicans and to Trump himself ASAP so he can make plans to liberate Canada and straighten out our Constitution shortly after returning to the White House. I firmly believe we need help from the USA to remove the frog yoke.
Forced diversity lowering quality of life by increase in crime and gun violence. Canadian cities have evolved into higher crime areas due to mass immigration. The elites don't and won't risk their lives by living in these areas but expect average Canadians to do so with a smile on their faces.
You have it wrong when you blame Quebec for the Trudeaus ; they both despise French-Canadians and are largely seen as traitors by nationalist Quebec French-Canadians. By the way, P.E.T.'s mother was Montreal Scottish, and you know Justin's mother is that crazy St-Clair woman from BC. Not much to do with Quebec ; accordingly, Justin's more English than French, which is obvious to a french ear when he ventures to speak the language. You just happen to have finally realized that you are also their victim. French power in Ottawa has all to do with demographics and elections and, accordingly, is dwindling. Third world immigration is used the same way in Quebec as in the rest of Canada, the only difference is more points for knowledge of french in a point system. Britain/the Empire has always used immigration against the French-Canadians. Our big sin as a people seems to have been wanting to survive. The confederation was a pact between equals only in words ; it was sold to French-Canadians as such and their political leaders at the time believed they could gain a measure of autonomy. In that regard the federal Liberals where always the centralizing force in Canada, displeasing all provinces but Ontario and the Maritimes. As well, if the 1982 constitution was favouring Quebec so much, how come no Quebec government, not even liberal, since has signed it? P.E.T. and his son are enforcing the "post-national" plan of their imperial sponsors, whose current storefront is the World Economic Forum. In P.E.T.'s time it was the British Fabian Society liberals. Your blind Quebec bashing is only serving the divide to reign imperial agenda. Canadian Conservatives have always favoured, and still would, a looser federal union, a confederation, which would have satisfied Quebec nationalists, be it Daniel Johnson (Égalité ou indépendance), René Lévesque (Souveraineté-association) or Jacques Parizeau.
Where does the Empire sit in Canada? It can be historically identified as "The Laurentians", the Quebec (once the capital of British Canada) - Montreal (The Golden Square mile of railroad tycoons and English/Scottish colonial merchants) - Toronto axis: anglos all, with their tag along sold out bourgeois indigenous pawns, along with their loyalist base in the Maritimes, Quebec Eastern Township and Eastern Ontario anglo Orangists.
French-Canadians have every reason to hate the Empire ; New France lost 20% of its population in the last phase of the Seven Years war, not only in the months-long bombardment of Quebec, but mainly due to the scorched earth tactic of general Wolfe downstream of Quebec. That's a larger percentage than the Russians lost in WWII... That's something we have in common with the Irish. And Daniel Johnson, the conservative Quebec PM who was shooting for a square deal with Ottawa, was, as his name shows, of Irish lineage. Finally, speaking of "Old Stock" Canadians, Mr. Salzberg (not an English name, that), no one is of older stock in Canada than the French-Canadians, the first Canadians.
i have told you from the beginning brad, quebec has never got over to losing to the english. its always the same, whats good for quebec, is no good for the rest of canada, there has to something major to stop all this bull crap. but it will, never going to happen, c,est la vie mon commrade.
Nov 7, 2022·edited Nov 7, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg
The answer to the question is unquestionably yes; Trudeau has an agenda. His fathers generation in Quebec cleverly played the ignorant masses against one another, masterfully playing the good guy bad guy game, which kept the Anglo old stock off their guard. Anglos for the most part had no humiliation to remember; there were very few in New France, even long after the Treaty of a Paris. But the humiliation was encouraged within Lower Canada it’s leaders keeping that pot simmering over decades. The fact is, elite French society, had no interest in either joining the American revolutionaries even though invited; the French had no interest in being melted in the American pot, or being subsumed by the English either.
The American Revolution successfully created a new country. People loyal to the English crown fled to Lower Canada especially to the Eastern Townships and to Upper Canada mostly along the north shores of Lake Ontario and the St Lawrence River. The curious thing is that Canada hosted very few English settlers — they preferred to emigrate to the United States. Loyalists spoke English but they were not Englishmen, they were North American colonists.
Two important consequences of the American Revolution on New France was the Jay Treaty of 1794 and the construction of the Erie Canal. England and the United States agreed to the present border between the United States and Canada. Thus within a single generation New France lost their hold over the lands west of the Appalachians and east of the Rocky Mountains. The enormous trade supported by trapping beaver on the dozens of rivers flowing into the Ohio and Mississippi lowlands was cut off. John Jacob Astor saw to that. His American Fur Company quickly took over the fur trade. Congress excluded foreign traders in 1817.
The Erie Canal, completed in 1825 was the first navigable waterway connecting the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes; stretching from the Hudson River near Albany NY, to Lake Erie above Niagara Falls, vastly reducing trade through the St Lawrence lowlands.
These events caused recession in Lower Canada. Railroads in the United States began to rapidly connected the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. The leading figures in Lower Canada had no interest in connecting to the American railroad network. The answer was to connect Lower Canada to the Pacific with a railroad ensuring a steady traffic in goods from west to east. However this required enormous borrowing! And borrowing as always required collateral which only a federated constitution could pledge. The French in Lower Canada had a problem; how to reconcile the further loss of sovereignty began in 1763, which would follow creating an enterprise with enough collateral to borrow the money to build the railroad.
After years of deliberation and many crossings of the Atlantic Ocean to London where constitutional authority was lodged Lower Canadians had the instrument they desired which enabled them to regain the power they had gradually lost over the hundred years before Confederation. Yes! Canada oddly, called the thing agreed to Confederation, but is in reality a Federation. Even more weirdly the United States is a confederation not a federation. Lower Canada wanted a federated structure — which is much like the European Union. Baked into the original “Confederation” are some important differences between a real confederation and a federation; one important difference is the distribution of seats in Parliament, as one example. There is not space enough here to write more.
The main point here, is certain aspects of Canadian history are not widely understood. Some aspects of Canada having a history which the majority do not know, such that the French see themselves as wounded and therefore are due more than the residents living in the other provinces and feel deeply justified in their claims, cause Canadians, not of French ancestry to wonder at their betrayal by especially the ruling elites in Quebec who never stop playing the game of justifiable reconciliation — as though Quebec was pushed out of their catbird seat by the ancestors of those living in the other provinces.
France lost the Seven Years War; no one invaded New France. The Loyalists immigrated to Canada; they did not invade. The United States and England established the border; which benefited Lower Canadians. The U.S. had to negotiate with Great Britain to have the border there at all. Manifest Destiny spoke otherwise. If it was not for English power in the nineteenth Century, Lower Canada might today be a State in a greater United States rather than a province in Canada. Are Quebecers grateful for that.
Pierre Trudeau restored the dwindling power of Quebec in the Canadian federation by patriating the so called “Constitution” and floating on its back, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter is, de facto, a Constitutional Amendment. Bilingualism as effected by the Charter was made the law of the land. This of cause, was meant to be exclusionary. In truth, how many people in the other provinces can ever expect to supplant the Quebec born bilingual power brokers in Ottawa.
Almost every last person in the Federal Government is a bilingual Quebecer or was born to couples whose first language is French; no doubt probably born in Eastern Ontario. The constitution is clear on the granting of certain authority over natural resources to the provinces. But Quebec has been blocking Alberta from exploiting its own resources.
The Present Prime Minister is continuing the centralizing of power in the PMOs office away from Parliament. The Provincial Premiers ought to resist that abrogation of Parliamentary authority to the PMOs office. Trudeau is not a King. Canadians have a constitution. It is a federation. The premiers have power and authority they are not using. There is a reason Britain decided the candle was not worth the flame. The Provinces could work in concert to threaten Canadas separation from Quebec.
But the premiers need some gumption i.e., backbone. Threaten to withhold the taxes sent to Ottawa, for example. Canadians ought to know and understand the nature of the Constitution. We live de jure in a federation. Do some homework.
Nov 7, 2022·edited Nov 7, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg
Quebec is another reason for Trudeau to push green policies/climate change on us......Quebec can then sell their excess hydro! They also have lithium mines!!!!
So as we suffer with inflation, carbon tax, etc., Trudeau is killing the western economies to benefit China and Quebec!!
Given the Quebec culture of Anglo hatred taught by the corrupt Catholic church from 1759 on, the answer to the question " Is Turd continuing to fight the Battle of the Plains of Abraham" is an emphatic YES. A bloodless genocide through mass immigration is part of the pogrom (not a typo). This means that this family and its associated cabal are de facto war criminals deserving of execution.
Two people that I knew several decades ago (one of these being J V Andrew , author of "Bilingual Today, French Tomorrow," "Backdoor Bilingualism," and "Enough!") were told by French Canadians; i. e., "frogs" that the British made two mistakes after the Conquest; viz., letting the frogs keep their language & religion and they wouldn't make that mistake when they took power.
All of this must get to Trump supporting Republicans and to Trump himself ASAP so he can make plans to liberate Canada and straighten out our Constitution shortly after returning to the White House. I firmly believe we need help from the USA to remove the frog yoke.
Forced diversity lowering quality of life by increase in crime and gun violence. Canadian cities have evolved into higher crime areas due to mass immigration. The elites don't and won't risk their lives by living in these areas but expect average Canadians to do so with a smile on their faces.
The article is well written, when I try to share your message FB doesn’t allow it.
You have it wrong when you blame Quebec for the Trudeaus ; they both despise French-Canadians and are largely seen as traitors by nationalist Quebec French-Canadians. By the way, P.E.T.'s mother was Montreal Scottish, and you know Justin's mother is that crazy St-Clair woman from BC. Not much to do with Quebec ; accordingly, Justin's more English than French, which is obvious to a french ear when he ventures to speak the language. You just happen to have finally realized that you are also their victim. French power in Ottawa has all to do with demographics and elections and, accordingly, is dwindling. Third world immigration is used the same way in Quebec as in the rest of Canada, the only difference is more points for knowledge of french in a point system. Britain/the Empire has always used immigration against the French-Canadians. Our big sin as a people seems to have been wanting to survive. The confederation was a pact between equals only in words ; it was sold to French-Canadians as such and their political leaders at the time believed they could gain a measure of autonomy. In that regard the federal Liberals where always the centralizing force in Canada, displeasing all provinces but Ontario and the Maritimes. As well, if the 1982 constitution was favouring Quebec so much, how come no Quebec government, not even liberal, since has signed it? P.E.T. and his son are enforcing the "post-national" plan of their imperial sponsors, whose current storefront is the World Economic Forum. In P.E.T.'s time it was the British Fabian Society liberals. Your blind Quebec bashing is only serving the divide to reign imperial agenda. Canadian Conservatives have always favoured, and still would, a looser federal union, a confederation, which would have satisfied Quebec nationalists, be it Daniel Johnson (Égalité ou indépendance), René Lévesque (Souveraineté-association) or Jacques Parizeau.
Where does the Empire sit in Canada? It can be historically identified as "The Laurentians", the Quebec (once the capital of British Canada) - Montreal (The Golden Square mile of railroad tycoons and English/Scottish colonial merchants) - Toronto axis: anglos all, with their tag along sold out bourgeois indigenous pawns, along with their loyalist base in the Maritimes, Quebec Eastern Township and Eastern Ontario anglo Orangists.
French-Canadians have every reason to hate the Empire ; New France lost 20% of its population in the last phase of the Seven Years war, not only in the months-long bombardment of Quebec, but mainly due to the scorched earth tactic of general Wolfe downstream of Quebec. That's a larger percentage than the Russians lost in WWII... That's something we have in common with the Irish. And Daniel Johnson, the conservative Quebec PM who was shooting for a square deal with Ottawa, was, as his name shows, of Irish lineage. Finally, speaking of "Old Stock" Canadians, Mr. Salzberg (not an English name, that), no one is of older stock in Canada than the French-Canadians, the first Canadians.
i have told you from the beginning brad, quebec has never got over to losing to the english. its always the same, whats good for quebec, is no good for the rest of canada, there has to something major to stop all this bull crap. but it will, never going to happen, c,est la vie mon commrade.
Maybe we should start building the wall to keep liberals out, they are demons, can't wait till there gone and not fast enough
The answer to the question is unquestionably yes; Trudeau has an agenda. His fathers generation in Quebec cleverly played the ignorant masses against one another, masterfully playing the good guy bad guy game, which kept the Anglo old stock off their guard. Anglos for the most part had no humiliation to remember; there were very few in New France, even long after the Treaty of a Paris. But the humiliation was encouraged within Lower Canada it’s leaders keeping that pot simmering over decades. The fact is, elite French society, had no interest in either joining the American revolutionaries even though invited; the French had no interest in being melted in the American pot, or being subsumed by the English either.
The American Revolution successfully created a new country. People loyal to the English crown fled to Lower Canada especially to the Eastern Townships and to Upper Canada mostly along the north shores of Lake Ontario and the St Lawrence River. The curious thing is that Canada hosted very few English settlers — they preferred to emigrate to the United States. Loyalists spoke English but they were not Englishmen, they were North American colonists.
Two important consequences of the American Revolution on New France was the Jay Treaty of 1794 and the construction of the Erie Canal. England and the United States agreed to the present border between the United States and Canada. Thus within a single generation New France lost their hold over the lands west of the Appalachians and east of the Rocky Mountains. The enormous trade supported by trapping beaver on the dozens of rivers flowing into the Ohio and Mississippi lowlands was cut off. John Jacob Astor saw to that. His American Fur Company quickly took over the fur trade. Congress excluded foreign traders in 1817.
The Erie Canal, completed in 1825 was the first navigable waterway connecting the Atlantic Ocean to the Great Lakes; stretching from the Hudson River near Albany NY, to Lake Erie above Niagara Falls, vastly reducing trade through the St Lawrence lowlands.
These events caused recession in Lower Canada. Railroads in the United States began to rapidly connected the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. The leading figures in Lower Canada had no interest in connecting to the American railroad network. The answer was to connect Lower Canada to the Pacific with a railroad ensuring a steady traffic in goods from west to east. However this required enormous borrowing! And borrowing as always required collateral which only a federated constitution could pledge. The French in Lower Canada had a problem; how to reconcile the further loss of sovereignty began in 1763, which would follow creating an enterprise with enough collateral to borrow the money to build the railroad.
After years of deliberation and many crossings of the Atlantic Ocean to London where constitutional authority was lodged Lower Canadians had the instrument they desired which enabled them to regain the power they had gradually lost over the hundred years before Confederation. Yes! Canada oddly, called the thing agreed to Confederation, but is in reality a Federation. Even more weirdly the United States is a confederation not a federation. Lower Canada wanted a federated structure — which is much like the European Union. Baked into the original “Confederation” are some important differences between a real confederation and a federation; one important difference is the distribution of seats in Parliament, as one example. There is not space enough here to write more.
The main point here, is certain aspects of Canadian history are not widely understood. Some aspects of Canada having a history which the majority do not know, such that the French see themselves as wounded and therefore are due more than the residents living in the other provinces and feel deeply justified in their claims, cause Canadians, not of French ancestry to wonder at their betrayal by especially the ruling elites in Quebec who never stop playing the game of justifiable reconciliation — as though Quebec was pushed out of their catbird seat by the ancestors of those living in the other provinces.
France lost the Seven Years War; no one invaded New France. The Loyalists immigrated to Canada; they did not invade. The United States and England established the border; which benefited Lower Canadians. The U.S. had to negotiate with Great Britain to have the border there at all. Manifest Destiny spoke otherwise. If it was not for English power in the nineteenth Century, Lower Canada might today be a State in a greater United States rather than a province in Canada. Are Quebecers grateful for that.
Pierre Trudeau restored the dwindling power of Quebec in the Canadian federation by patriating the so called “Constitution” and floating on its back, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter is, de facto, a Constitutional Amendment. Bilingualism as effected by the Charter was made the law of the land. This of cause, was meant to be exclusionary. In truth, how many people in the other provinces can ever expect to supplant the Quebec born bilingual power brokers in Ottawa.
Almost every last person in the Federal Government is a bilingual Quebecer or was born to couples whose first language is French; no doubt probably born in Eastern Ontario. The constitution is clear on the granting of certain authority over natural resources to the provinces. But Quebec has been blocking Alberta from exploiting its own resources.
The Present Prime Minister is continuing the centralizing of power in the PMOs office away from Parliament. The Provincial Premiers ought to resist that abrogation of Parliamentary authority to the PMOs office. Trudeau is not a King. Canadians have a constitution. It is a federation. The premiers have power and authority they are not using. There is a reason Britain decided the candle was not worth the flame. The Provinces could work in concert to threaten Canadas separation from Quebec.
But the premiers need some gumption i.e., backbone. Threaten to withhold the taxes sent to Ottawa, for example. Canadians ought to know and understand the nature of the Constitution. We live de jure in a federation. Do some homework.
Quebec is another reason for Trudeau to push green policies/climate change on us......Quebec can then sell their excess hydro! They also have lithium mines!!!!
So as we suffer with inflation, carbon tax, etc., Trudeau is killing the western economies to benefit China and Quebec!!
I don’t for a minute believe he ‘cares’ about these people but only ‘using’ them for his evil plan and sick mind!!!