Jagmeet Singh Brands Canada Racist As 16 Sikhs Sit In Parliament
Not only is it the most dramatic instance of political over-representation in Canada. It is likely the most extreme on a world-wide basis.
“The reality is, our Canada is a place of racism, of violence.”
— NDP Party Leader Jagmeet Singh, June 14th 2021.
Sixteen Sikh-Canadians are current members of parliament. With a population of over a billion, India has 13 Sikh MP's. It is on this basis that New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh brands Canada racist and genocidal.
On a provincial level, the World Sikh Organization proudly proclaim the number of Sikhs in the house:
Ontario: Parm Gill, Amarjot Sandu, Prabmeet Singh, Gurratan Singh.
British Columbia: Jas Johal, Rachna Singh, Niki Sharma, Ravi Khalon, Harry Bains, Raj Chouhan.
Manitoba: Diljeet Bear, Mintu Sandhu ; Alberta: Rajan Sawhnev, Peter Singh, Devinder Toor.
Canadian Sikhs number roughly 500,000 people and account for roughly 1.4% of Canada's population. Not only is this the most dramatic instance of political over-representation in our country. It is likely the most extreme on a world-wide level.
In late 2021, an unprecedented event occurred in Alberta, Canada. Sikh-Canadian candidates won in both the Calgary and Edmonton mayoral elections.
Jhoti Gondek is the first Sikh-Canadian to become mayor of Calgary. She takes over from Naheed Nenshi, three-time winner as mayor of Alberta’s largest city. As a Canadian of Ismaili descent, Nenshi is a leading supporter of Muslim rights in Canada.
On the very same night, Edmonton mayor Don Iveson was replaced by Amarjeet Sohi, former member of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Cabinet. It well appears Edmontonians have done a complete about-face. Or have they?
Federal Liberal MP candidates failed to win a single seat in Alberta in the 2019 election. In 2021, they managed to elect two MP’s. From all points of view, Alberta is an anti-Liberal province. After which ex-Liberal MP Amarjeet Singh is elected as mayor of Edmonton.
A rather curious development, no? But not as perplexing as a related political phenomenon: how is it that Canada can be continuously branded “systemically racist” on this basis?
“Systemic racism is an issue right across the country, in all our institutions, including in all our police forces, including in the RCMP.”
— Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Sikh-Canadian MP winners in the 2021 federal election:
Harjit Sajjan, Jagmeet Singh, Randeep Singh Sarai, Tim Uppal, Jasraj Hallan, George Chahal, Anju Dhillon, Maninder Sidhu, Sonia Sidhu, Kamal Khera, Ruby Sahota, Bardish Chagger, Anita Anand, Sukh Dhaliwal, Iqwinder Gaheer, Parm Bains.
The National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), a prominent civil liberties & advocacy organization, testified before the House of Commons Standing Committee regarding its study on systemic racism and religious discrimination.
“The federal government should pass legislation requiring the public service to collect, analyse, act on, and report on race data in order to identify disproportionate service provisions and detect signs of systemic discrimination.”
Bringing about a most salient question: how can the NCCM advance these accusations when a plethora of evidence suggests the opposite is true?
Answer: Because they can. Because multiculturalism, diversity and woke culture control our society. We are living in Justin Trudeau's post-modern Canada. Logic, data, statistics be damned. These social circumstances are based on emotion. It is emotion that wins in the political realm– not fact– or heaven forbid, any form of truth.
Under these circumstances politicians can keep on accusing, multicultural organizations can keep on demanding, and 3rd world journalists in mainstream media can keep complaining.
There is a word for the phenomenon: insatiability. This lies at the core of Canada’s diversity agenda. No level of satisfaction is to be achieved. In this we find what has not once been considered by Canadian media or academia:
Where does it stop?
The simple answer is– it doesn’t, and never will. There is no “ceiling” for Multiculturalism. No point of satisfaction has ever been defined. A demarcation of the point at which ethnic equality has been achieved does not exist. As such, the diversity agenda can roll on forever. Trudeau knows it, Jagmeet Singh knows it, media never speak of it.
Will a time arrive when government’s quest for social equality will result in social inequality against "Old Stock" Canadians? Could society eventually “flip over" as Anglophones replace “racialized’ Canadians as the oppressed communities of our country? CAP believe PM Trudeau wants this very badly.
Thus, we arrive at the crux of the issue: the policy of multiculturalism as forced upon Canada by ex-Liberal PM Pierre Trudeau is punitive in nature. For the purveyors of the Justin Trudeau's woke revolution, it is now pay-back time.
The fact that the guilty parties are long-deceased is irrelevant. Emotion-- not logic-- rules in Trudeau transformation land. The very same exists in all neo-totalitarian seductions of society.
I have to agree Canada is becoming more racist everyday. …against whites. Frankly, before all the hullabaloo about gays etc. and people such as Trudeau, Singh, and Freeland, and many others including Francophone Quebecers — beginning 70 years ago — began elevating their language, race, and sexual preferences as being under attack by white-Anglos, I never had negative thoughts against other people for those reasons. I did in the particular, have negative thoughts about certain criminal behaviours, but not generally negative thoughts about all the different ways humans manifested their uniqueness. Indeed the business I am in today and have been for over 55 years was over represented — proportionally — by gays and Jews, and other “ minorities “ in 1967.
Indeed the appeal of the business for me, then as now, was that all these people including French people made life interesting. Perhaps even then I was a minority, with my blue eyes, and fair skin. I was raised in a home to appreciate difference not homogeneity. We did not discuss different attributes as deserving of my tolerance — indeed the atmosphere was non judgemental — and it was expected that I would have to make my way in life by expressing my fundamental uniqueness not suppressing it, while accepting others fundamental uniquenesses. So to me every
person I met was unique including those whom today are suddenly labelled racist because they are white. The basic family code was tolerance unless proved otherwise.
Society today seems to be adopting a view that whites are automatically guilty of being racist and in interpersonal relations whites have to apologize for being white.
Since all the hullabaloo began to dominate public discourse I have become increasingly interested in history. And having done so I am now of the conviction that certain minority groups have been using selective events done by whites as cover for their generally calculatingly and deceptive behaviour. …In other words carrying out the most ugly forms of human behaviour under the cover of accusations of whites being anti-Semitic if and when these ugly behaviours are called out. I am convinced whites are being set up as scapegoats. And furthermore I am convinced that if there is a backlash against accusations of white misbehaviour it is intended that the backlash is against, not the aforesaid calculatingly malevolent minority commonly known as Jews, but against the vast and endless minorities whom have been led down the garden path to believe something which is just not true. Multiculturalism is a construct. Mankind is inherently multi-cultural.
Most people are loyal to their country of birth, of course. Immigrants used to come to Canada and the U.S. because by doing so they daughter betterment for themselves and their progeny, becoming loyal citizens. Except Jews! Most of the important positions in the present U.S. administration are Jews and their primary loyalties are to Israel. Most have dual citizenships. Many decent people do not like the inference. Why? Because they have been brainwashed.
And worse; while the newspapers and radio and TV never stop the anti-Anglo and anti-white propaganda and the pro-multicultural agenda whites have come to hating themselves. Thus they have stepped aside and enabled the Jewish minority to promulgate their own agenda. Which to say the least is to destroy any hegemonic groups other than their own. …And steal all the wealth and power necessary for them to achieve the aim stated by them of controlling the entire planet. I am not accusing them of behaviour they themselves do not advocate in their own Jewish literature — the Talmud and Torah. Loyal Israelis call themselves Zionists.