26 Comments
Nov 25, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg

If Trudeau wouldn't have dragged on the man dates and had asked really true scientist on the virus and the gene therapy and not the government supposedly medical people, too many made up their minds once they started to hear the truth such as the speech from WEF Klausy boy on how half of the cabinet was filtrated by him, a lot of this wouldn't of happen. The same on paying off the news media to sit and ddodoo nothing in reporting the truth of anything. You still push the vaccine if you call it that and the lies we hear, they are not brought up to people lying without getting a cuff across the head, at least that's what I would have got. Bottom line is yours got no credibility left. I'm pretty sure alot more can be said but I said too much now, grow up would be a and apologize

Expand full comment

What a clown. Children were in no danger. The only danger is the Liberals' with help from the NDP.

Expand full comment
Nov 25, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg

Narcissist can't distinguish lies from the truth. Nothing surprises anymore.

Expand full comment
Nov 26, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg

‘It’ does not like to be challenged. He figures he is God! The Freedom Convoy has been the best thing in the past two years. One more reason so that he can change all legislation to fit HIS agenda. Last thing he has in mind is the dignity and rights of Canadian people!

Expand full comment

The Liberals are a bunch of whiners' people that pretend to do good to others, while being judgmental themselves. Trudeau plays the victim very well, while imposing their immoral values on others all in the name of 'good'.

Expand full comment

what an unfeeling hypocrite

Expand full comment
Nov 25, 2022Liked by Brad Salzberg

What a rotten pos liar, he’d say anything to get his ass off the hook! Won’t work anymore trudick, everyone knows you to be a lying commie pig!

Expand full comment
founding

QUESTION: To David Vigneault, CCIS Director

.

Re: Conduct of our PM and Cabinet Ministers, January 2022 to date

.

During the recent Public Order Emergency commission hearings there have been numerous instances documented where our Prime Minister, members of his cabinet and various employees of the federal government have initiated actions that contravene Canadian Law. The most obvious and most troublesome example is that where the definition of what constitutes a threat to the security of Canada was ‘extended’ to meet political objectives.

.

My question is a simple one and one easily understood within the context of an individual who since first being elected in 2015, as been found to be in Contempt of Parliament 5 times.

.

Justin Trudeau has:

1) Ignored Canadian Law, extending it and detracting from it whenever and wherever it meets his own political objectives,

2) Initiated the illegal seizure of the property of Canadian citizens, such as funds in their Bank accounts,

3) Ignored the requirement to consult with provincial authorities before invoking the Emergencies Act,

4) Ignored all advice provided by federal, provincial, and municipal police forces that clearly stated there was no need or justification to implement the Emergencies Act.

.

The information provided above is very factual and contains little in the way of opinion. I’m going to depart from that below.

.

A great deal has been said about the federal governments desire to protect the residents of Ottawa from the ‘excesses’ of those attending the protests. Surprisingly, during the Ottawa October mayoral race, Catherine McKenney the activist Councillor who was the leader in the mayor race was subsequently defeated by Mark Sutcliffe, after her appearance at the Emergency Act hearings. Clearly not everyone in Ottawa had the same concerns about the Trucker Convoy protests as Ms. McKenney.

.

.

There are many Canadians who find our current PM’s behaviour odd and different in many respects from those who preceded him in that office. He is the son of a former PM, a kid from a broken home, and seemingly not a happy one. He grew up frequently hearing his Mother referred in rather unflattering terms. Justin Trudeau has throughout his career made optimal use of Divide and Conquer strategies, and his distain for Old Stock Canadians is well known.

.

While everyone’s actions are open to interpretation it is fair to say that Justin’s behaviours have attracted far mor attention than most. It is a well recognized fact that no one would openly oppose the PM and expect to keep their job in his Cabinet. The Totalitarian and Authoritarian characteristics of his government are well documented and not subject to any great debate. World renown Clinical Psychologist Jordan Peterson has indicated on numerous occasions that Trudeau has a ‘classic narcistic’ personality. When he makes an assertion like that as a professional, he knowingly leaves himself open to being sued by Justin, if he cannot justify offering that professional opinion.

.

The threat of terrorist activity was raised time and time again during 2022. Some believed it was real. Others believed that a great deal of Trudeau’s efforts appeared to be very purposefully designed to trigger a violent reaction.

.

Justin Trudeau has training as an actor, but he is rather transparent and not a very good actor. Those who know him well have stated that he is not a deep thinker. My question to CSIS summarizes one final concern about our Prime Minister.

.

Has Justin Trudeau’s actions and behaviours since January 2020 not fully met CSIS’ definition of an Ideologically Motivated Violent Extremist (IMVE) ???

.

https://youtu.be/fNEd0IERelU

.

https://rumble.com/v1x2o1e-live-pm-trudeau-testifies-at-the-emergencies-act-inquiry-day-31.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=4

.

Expand full comment

If someone is telling you who they are...believe them.

Expand full comment

Bullshit

Expand full comment

Right off the top, I am not a Trudeau supporter but I will say this, from the get go of this trucker convoy and occupation of Ottawa and the border crossings I did not agree with the action of this small fringe group of protesters and apparently so did the majority of Canadians, the actions of this disgruntled group was harmful to our image and certainly our economy , the country could well afford the loss of millions of dollars daily and the threat of losing our trade privileges with the U.S, especially the car industry, hundreds would have lost their livelihood. This is by no means a disrespect for you Mr. Salzburg and your articles but I in all consciousness have to disagree with your views here as well as with most of the comments. I did watch most of the Emergency Act enquiry and learned so much about the workings of Parliament but it did not change my view point of the unfortunate event.

Expand full comment