“The most influential organizer of David Rockefeller’s ‘zero growth’ agenda in the early 1970s was Rockefeller’s longtime friend, billionaire Canadian Maurice Strong."
In a nutshell this treasonous linkage between the Lieberal party and its almost intimate association with communist organizations goes back many decades. I recall that the handling of the Igor Gouzenko affair by the Lieberal government indicates communist infiltration way back then and probably much further. No wonder pos Pierre Turdeau abolished the death penalty for treason.
Hiding behind an egalitarian invisibility cloak of "democratic" socialism gives them the freedom to carryout their main Agenda in secrecy. One wonders whether the Schwabian puppets like our own Ardern (ex leader of International Socialist Youth) and your Trudeau are even aware of the main Agenda of the freemasonic/illuminati Rothchilds and their cabal.
Many of them also believe that Justin Trudeau is either insane, on drugs, or more likely both. If you doubt that then study his behaviour during his testimony at the Emergency Act hearings.
Tragically, Canada is a communist country. It is extremely difficult to see oneself as others see us. The same is true for societies. Canadians would never have consented to our political class deciding to pursue a political agenda as antithetical to what existed in the 1960s, as obviously exists today, had it been introduced all of a sudden.
Communism is an agenda. Any ideology, promulgating such massive societal change as the deterministic intention to transform and replace Canada’s free market economy, including all its consensual relationships, to one with a top down permission granting socioeconomic model, where nothing is acceptable without approval, a priori, where all relationships include the state — would have been immediately rejected in parliament by the elected representatives of choice.
Today the only acceptable socioeconomic model is one where only those whom are identifiable subscribers to the communist agenda are merited. Everyone else can go suck a lemon. The Communist agenda today is an intentionally opaque construct, whereas in 1917 it was in your face. The word communism has been intentionally scrubbed from their vocabulary. The present Agenda is larded with mealy mouth words and phrases which under examination are meaningless in the ordinary sense. When pressed communists have nothing but contempt for those opposing them. They are blindly forging ahead no matter the opposition. They own the dialectic. They intentionally constructed a dialectic which structurally has been promulgated as self evident — and meant to be unassailable.
What’s worse they refuse to answer the accusation that left and right are in effect the same thing — a manifestation of a top down hyper-structure run by a small coterie of extraordinarily powerful individuals most people have no idea exist.
There is a powerful community of secondary and tertiary adherents to support and buttress their Agenda. The rich want to stay rich. Bureaucrats “educated” in a university system which has been gradually transformed from its enlightenment roots, by an intentional process of subversion, where carefully placed administrative boards have turned universities into a means of brainwashing and meta programming of those who attend, turning them into servants of an ideology most definitely antithetical to their own long run interests.
There, one is exposed to an insidiously corrupting feel good agenda, where even if the attendants doubt the premises, they do not doubt the advantages of adherence. Follow the money! The bureaucratic class are instruments hired to do only one thing; promulgate an Agenda which gradually — ever so gradually — subordinates everyone and every social process to controls only dreamt of in our worst nightmares.
These controls are imbedded in legislation. Of course lawyers and judges, themselves products of the same institutions as the bureaucrats, are carefully groomed and vetted while they pursue upward mobility within their discipline. Is it necessary here to state the obvious? They bring the arguments necessary to aid the gradual subversion of the broader public’s interests into court rooms or as advisers into board rooms.
Politicians too are products or these institutions. They are also groomed! The party back rooms are larded with people whom are socially and financially members of the elite and who seek to benefit by policies which reenforce their socioeconomic standing. Some of these are former politicians whom are not themselves necessarily rich or “well born” but enjoy their proximity to the powerful and rich. Upward mobility propels clever men to seek office. Often they are parvenu upstarts like in Canada, Brian Mulroney and Pierre Trudeau. Politicians? Whose interests do the serve? The people? Or their masters?
Bureaucrats, lawyers, politicians, sociological converts, corporate executives, together gradually subvert the entirety of society. They collectively believe what they believe. And are paid well to believe it. They collectively and naturally seek that which is adventitious for themselves.
After serving the Agenda for 30 or 40 years; can it be expected they will suddenly subvert their own situation?
Teachers don’t teach. Things teachers should teach would be subversive to those who would run the entire world — some would say those who do run it.
Anne Applebaum wrote a book back in 2012…Iron Curtain, The Crushing of Eastern Europe 1944 -1956
The early chapters paint a picture of the way Communism destroys society. Believe me it is chilling. Whatever you think of Applebaum read the book. Weirdly, from the perspective of the USSR as it existed in 1944 which she exposes for the monster it was, she is a self proclaimed leftist. What was the USSR under Communism?…Left or Right.
Yet one would think looking at the world today she would proclaim herself anti-totalitarian, rather than a leftist. The West looks to becoming more totalitarian every day.
The left though are playing handmaidens to totalitarian instrumentalism. Right and left are forging a grand bargain. The ideological debates are as always rife with argumentation. The argument is distracting.
Left and right are dancing to the same music “We Want to Control You,” is the song.
Forget the left right dichotomy. The danger is Communist Totalitarianism.
In a nutshell this treasonous linkage between the Lieberal party and its almost intimate association with communist organizations goes back many decades. I recall that the handling of the Igor Gouzenko affair by the Lieberal government indicates communist infiltration way back then and probably much further. No wonder pos Pierre Turdeau abolished the death penalty for treason.
Yeah, now we see why. LIBERALS could have qualified
Hiding behind an egalitarian invisibility cloak of "democratic" socialism gives them the freedom to carryout their main Agenda in secrecy. One wonders whether the Schwabian puppets like our own Ardern (ex leader of International Socialist Youth) and your Trudeau are even aware of the main Agenda of the freemasonic/illuminati Rothchilds and their cabal.
The woke pogroms are picking up speed on a daily basis.
Very well written and again lays bare the roots of the destruction of our society...
Thanks very much, such a shame Canada had to be taken down by the Trudeau's and their Cabal
Have you wondered why it is that so many conservatives are willing to risk their lives and die if necessary, to defend their Freedoms and Beliefs ???
.
This text, written by Belgian Psychologist and Statistician Mattias Desmet, contains the answer.
.
https://www.amazon.ca/Psychology-Totalitarianism-Mattias-Desmet/dp/1645021726
.
Many of them also believe that Justin Trudeau is either insane, on drugs, or more likely both. If you doubt that then study his behaviour during his testimony at the Emergency Act hearings.
.
SANE PEOPLE DO NOT DENY REALITY.
.
https://youtu.be/NwyyjC7Z9I4
.
If Trudeau is the bell then I WANT to Ring his bell, and hard !
Tragically, Canada is a communist country. It is extremely difficult to see oneself as others see us. The same is true for societies. Canadians would never have consented to our political class deciding to pursue a political agenda as antithetical to what existed in the 1960s, as obviously exists today, had it been introduced all of a sudden.
Communism is an agenda. Any ideology, promulgating such massive societal change as the deterministic intention to transform and replace Canada’s free market economy, including all its consensual relationships, to one with a top down permission granting socioeconomic model, where nothing is acceptable without approval, a priori, where all relationships include the state — would have been immediately rejected in parliament by the elected representatives of choice.
Today the only acceptable socioeconomic model is one where only those whom are identifiable subscribers to the communist agenda are merited. Everyone else can go suck a lemon. The Communist agenda today is an intentionally opaque construct, whereas in 1917 it was in your face. The word communism has been intentionally scrubbed from their vocabulary. The present Agenda is larded with mealy mouth words and phrases which under examination are meaningless in the ordinary sense. When pressed communists have nothing but contempt for those opposing them. They are blindly forging ahead no matter the opposition. They own the dialectic. They intentionally constructed a dialectic which structurally has been promulgated as self evident — and meant to be unassailable.
What’s worse they refuse to answer the accusation that left and right are in effect the same thing — a manifestation of a top down hyper-structure run by a small coterie of extraordinarily powerful individuals most people have no idea exist.
There is a powerful community of secondary and tertiary adherents to support and buttress their Agenda. The rich want to stay rich. Bureaucrats “educated” in a university system which has been gradually transformed from its enlightenment roots, by an intentional process of subversion, where carefully placed administrative boards have turned universities into a means of brainwashing and meta programming of those who attend, turning them into servants of an ideology most definitely antithetical to their own long run interests.
There, one is exposed to an insidiously corrupting feel good agenda, where even if the attendants doubt the premises, they do not doubt the advantages of adherence. Follow the money! The bureaucratic class are instruments hired to do only one thing; promulgate an Agenda which gradually — ever so gradually — subordinates everyone and every social process to controls only dreamt of in our worst nightmares.
These controls are imbedded in legislation. Of course lawyers and judges, themselves products of the same institutions as the bureaucrats, are carefully groomed and vetted while they pursue upward mobility within their discipline. Is it necessary here to state the obvious? They bring the arguments necessary to aid the gradual subversion of the broader public’s interests into court rooms or as advisers into board rooms.
Politicians too are products or these institutions. They are also groomed! The party back rooms are larded with people whom are socially and financially members of the elite and who seek to benefit by policies which reenforce their socioeconomic standing. Some of these are former politicians whom are not themselves necessarily rich or “well born” but enjoy their proximity to the powerful and rich. Upward mobility propels clever men to seek office. Often they are parvenu upstarts like in Canada, Brian Mulroney and Pierre Trudeau. Politicians? Whose interests do the serve? The people? Or their masters?
Bureaucrats, lawyers, politicians, sociological converts, corporate executives, together gradually subvert the entirety of society. They collectively believe what they believe. And are paid well to believe it. They collectively and naturally seek that which is adventitious for themselves.
After serving the Agenda for 30 or 40 years; can it be expected they will suddenly subvert their own situation?
Teachers don’t teach. Things teachers should teach would be subversive to those who would run the entire world — some would say those who do run it.
Anne Applebaum wrote a book back in 2012…Iron Curtain, The Crushing of Eastern Europe 1944 -1956
The early chapters paint a picture of the way Communism destroys society. Believe me it is chilling. Whatever you think of Applebaum read the book. Weirdly, from the perspective of the USSR as it existed in 1944 which she exposes for the monster it was, she is a self proclaimed leftist. What was the USSR under Communism?…Left or Right.
Yet one would think looking at the world today she would proclaim herself anti-totalitarian, rather than a leftist. The West looks to becoming more totalitarian every day.
The left though are playing handmaidens to totalitarian instrumentalism. Right and left are forging a grand bargain. The ideological debates are as always rife with argumentation. The argument is distracting.
Left and right are dancing to the same music “We Want to Control You,” is the song.
Forget the left right dichotomy. The danger is Communist Totalitarianism.