Why Prejudice Against White Canadians Must Be Added To "Anti-Racism" Initiatives
"That experiment[immigration policy] is radically altering the ethnic makeup of the population. Yet that decision was never properly debated. Has the time come for such a debate, or is it too late?"
"Donald Trump's pledge to fight what he calls "anti-white feeling" in the U.S. will likely embolden allies who seek to dismantle government and corporate programs created to battle racism and boost diversity in American life."
What else to expect from media other than repudiation of a "post-post modern" concept regarding race relations in western society? North of the 49th parallel, in Canada, not a word has been whispered in the mainstream press regarding the premise of adding "anti-white" sentiment to the pantheon of race-relations.
In this Canadians can witness the hypocrisy of "progressive" liberal politics. Forever espousing "equality" as an ultimate goal, PM Justin Trudeau and the Liberals refuse to entertain the idea of authentic "social equity."
"Passed during a time when Black Americans campaigned aggressively for civil rights, the act prohibits hiring or compensation decisions based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."
"Hamilton, who served in the Justice Department under Trump, says the act should protect white people as well."
A fascinating concept it is, one that will enter the consciousness of Canadian society on the 12th of Never. Government hate it, media loathe it, academic institutions brand it "racist."
But what happens when Canada’s overall demography progresses into a social dynamic in which no identifiable community dominates society? Is this not the ostensible goal of our Liberal government's "diversity" agenda.
CAP refuse to beat around the woke bush: Equality is in no manner the ultimate objective. Domination-- now that's another ballgame. Therefore, all propositions promoting anti-racism initiatives for Anglophone-Canadians will hit the dumpster faster than you can say "diversity is our strength."
"The Politics Of 2036, When Canada Is As Brown As It Is White"
"Opponents of Canada's wide-open immigration policy have good reason to complain. This country embarked on a massive social experiment in the early 1990s, when the Mulroney government opened the immigration floodgates."
"That experiment is radically altering the ethnic makeup of the population. Yet that decision was never properly debated. Has the time come for such a debate, or is it too late?"
Posited back in 2016, the question strikes at the heart of contemporary Canadian society. In this regard, one must understand the manner in which government and media control our social narrative.
Yes, the time has come for debate. No, our controlling institutions will never permit it. Based on government-media collusion, the same pattern will play out as it did with Multiculturalism. By the time general society figures out the policies detrimental impact on our "Old Stock" Canadian communities, it will be too late to do anything to rectify the situation.
It’s a set-up certain to play out for Canada's Anglo-European communities. By 2040, or perhaps earlier, white citizens will transition to a minority community. If the Liberal Party of Canada has their way, whites will also exist as the singular identifiable minority community in which targeted prejudice is socially permissible.
For Cultural Action Party [est. 2016], it's the true meaning of Trudeau's proclamation of a "post-modern" society. Some thirty years down the woke road, when the structure is fully ingrained, Canadians may begin to comprehend "what went down."
Either it's equality, or it isn't. Below the border in the United States, protection of white community rights is at least referenced within media narrative. In Canada? Forget about it-- it will never happen, at least not until it is far too late.
Recent times a have seen a plethora of empowerment for Canada's "racialized" communities. We stand witness as a Ugandan import Attorney General, MP Arif Virani, appoints a Muslim co-religionist from Uganda to head up the Canadian Human Rights Commission. A major piece of community empowerment it is.
"I think there is a definite anti-white feeling in this country," Trump told Time in a recent interview.
To say this doesn't exist in Canada is pathetically laughable. After nearly ten years of our current Liberal government, the sentiment is ingrained in all our social institutions.
Trudeau condemns Canada for its colonial foundation. New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh brands our country genocidal. Media reflect the will of government. Academia thrash our communities on an ongoing basis with their DEI, CRT and BIOPIC agendas. Corporations maintain hiring procedures that exclude whites from being hired.
"Canada has become a nation of diasporas. Rather than wrapping ourselves in a common flag, we huddle in our enclaves: Muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Jewish, Chinese, Black and the list goes on. Faith, color and country of origin divide the nation."
Is this, in reality, an actual goal of government? Let us ponder this for a moment. Let's say you wanted to revolutionize a society, transitioning it to something the citizens of a nation never asked for.
Which scenario would lead to success faster? A united, cohesive pluralist society, or a divided, fragmented collection of communities. If you selected the latter, what source for social manipulation would you utilize?
The history of 20th century social revolutions tells the story. Chairman Mao Tse Tung in China, Stalin and Lenin in the Soviet Union, Fidel Castro's Cuba, in addition to the advent of European fascism during World War 2.
In each case, a "demonized" ethnic or religious community was set-up to be the "fall-guy." Could a similar dynamic exist at the heart of Justin Trudeau's "Woke Revolution?"
In a society "dedicated to ethnic quality" as purported by our Liberal government, there exists one community which falls outside the spectrum of so-called "inclusiveness."
Rendering the entire structure a lie. Without inclusiveness for Anglo-Europeans, the agenda is nothing less than systemic racism directed at a single identifiable community.
I am a 76 year old white male. Justin Trudeau’s father Pierre E Trudeau was a communist . Communists stopped referring to themselves or their rotten ideology as an ideal, realizing communism could never be realized honestly. Obviously communism earned a reputation in certain countries for the evil it is.
So instead they began to elevate progressivism and progress as a paramount ideal instead. Indeed classic virtue signalling.
Who in the 20th Century dare critique progress. But it is a classic deception!
It was the underpinning for a neologism suddenly fashionable, multiculturalism — a word of course loved by a generation of people who suddenly found themselves with a university degree devoid of certain classic underpinnings of a classical education. In other words they knew no history, no economics, and no political science other than certain received memes newly fashionable in pseudo educated circles.
Memes they repeated and never questioned.
These newly minted graduates never questioned the terms of the debate. They automatically saw that parroting the received conferred upward mobility and so disdained those who saw no merit in parroting the ideology of progressivism.
Progressivism was a cover you might say — disguising something evil and bad — as being something desirable and progressive.
Politicians, journalists, professors, civil servants (as they were then known), actresses and actors — imagined themselves as elites. The culture bestowed on them merits they never deserved. They were used!
Where did we see that before. Of course, in the Soviet Union. Useful idiots someone called them then.
Where are we today? Didn’t Trudeau Jr recently announce these affluent followers of political fashion were going to be fleeced.
So Canada today is a Fascist state. One in which every democratic institution has been overrun by internationalists and their ideology of their Rules Based Order.
Didn’t Biden issue Trudeau with orders to solve the border problem and then when Canadas fair minded citizens charged with keeping the peace accepted the Truckers were indeed peaceful and so left them to protest — indeed so peacefully parents were handing their children up into the truck cabs.
But Trudeau denigrated them in language completely inappropriate while failing to provide them the decency of a meeting.
The men in military garb brought in to break up the demonstration were unidentifiable. They were flown into Canada on a NATO plane landing in North Bay then bussed to Ottawa.
This is the man something like 25% of the population is said by pollsters will vote for him.
This is the man who lied about what he said during an interview on French TV, denying he said it when he sat before a board set up to investigate the legitimacy of his declaring the entire affair a national emergency invoking the War Measures Act.
Any decent democracy would have a means of evoking the recall of a Prime Minister manufacturing such discontent.
The years since Prime Minister Trudeau Sr have seen Canadas democratic principles and institutions eroded by the constant application of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is much like a thief in the night. The courts have seen off the founding principles of Canada’s Constitution calling it a living tree. Its protections were not ill conceived — they are intended to protect you, me and our children from the overbearing state Canada has become.
The most effective war is the one the target doesn't realize is happening.