Guess again. Whomever is the King of England or the Queen of England serves as a representative of a long established code of jurisprudence, government, and a structure resilient but flexible over time. Of course these people are human not gods. It is not that the English monarchy is omnipotent — it is they represent an established form of social cohesion. Without which most likely there would be chaos. In fact the best argument for the benefits of such an established system of governance is Justin Trudeau, where the lack of a countervailing system of restraint, and tradition, allows him to ride roughshod over Canadas constitutional arrangements — done without restraint.
He has abrogated any number of established rights without such restraints which I find abhorrent. The English system is essentially precedent. The Canadian system is with recourse to the Charter which is proving to be as malleable in his hands as any dictator could want. In Canada the Supreme Court tends to make laws rather than interpret them. This is a precedent apt to render laws meaninglessly indeterminate and unpredictable. Citizens then depend on chance and influence to receive Justice. To my mind Justin Trudeau is a public menace.
The truckers had every established right of assembly to bring their complaints to the seat of Government. Whether you or I or Justin Trudeau agreed with them or not he treated them as though he was king and the truckers were petitioners. Justin Trudeau was elected to serve the truckers. He ran roughshod over them but much worse their rights. Their rights are our rights.
Do Canadians really want a dictator ruling them. Long established precedent would have served Canadians in the instance. Only tradition and precedent enables a people to trust their institutions and to trust those whom we expect to protect our established rights. The entire establishment abdicated. The premiers could have assembled in Ottawa to protest Trudeau’s overreach, but they didn’t. The Governor General did nothing. The Judiciary did nothing. Canadians have been seduced by progressivism — a silly dialectic where absolutism is guaranteed to sneak in the back door. Absolutism is a chimera. Justin Trudeau acted as though he had absolute freedom to do as he pleased. The public failed to protest! Why? Because they have come to believe that any form of restraint is an unnecessary encumbrance. Trudeau is simply doing “his own thing.”
Please predict the next few years with Trudeau doing his own thing. However, as you wrote, it’s not just Trudeau it’s the entire establishment of premiers, etc. What will Canada look like in 10 years? Thanks.
Everyone must quickly educate themselves with respect to the Coronation Oath as well as Common Law, as it is the supreme law, even superseding our Constitutional Rights and Freedoms. I listened to a webinar last night with Action4Canada as the hosts and David Lindsay as the guest, who gave a brief overview of Common Law and the Coronation Oath. David will be presenting a series of webinars beginning in September sometime, and over the course of a few months, will be covering many topics on the above topic. You could check www.action4canada.com and can also send an email to clear2012@pm.me for more information. It would come as no surprise to find that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh and all the liberal MPs will do their utmost to sever Canada's ties with the British Crown.
Canadians do not know they have been subjected to lies and propaganda since before 1867. England had nothing to do with legislation passed in Canada to form a federation here. Why would the monarchy object. Here’s why not.
The monarchy is no more than a figurehead and since Olivier Cromwell England’s finances were controlled by Jews. The Lower Canada elite did not want a Confederation nor a Federation except they had to do something to arrest the waning fortunes of those in power in Quebec. Louis-Joseph Papineau described Lower Canada as a distinct geographic, economic and cultural space, forever destined to serve the Habitant as a Catholic and French nation.
Papineau and his supporters wanted to preserve the ancien regime.
Eventually the elite in Canada East came to realize that without a trans-Canada railroad the gradual erosion of Francophone power in North America was doomed.
Bankers in England, of course, well understood lending money for railroad expansion, without certain security, was not a good bet. The answer was a larger entity than Canada East. Confederation of course was seen as an existential compromise. Shrewdly Lower Canada opted for a federation, although it was called a Confederation. Certain established peoples though blocked the railroad. The Indians and the Métis. It was not the English after 1867 deciding policy in Canada. Canada’s elected parliament rejected Métis claims and Indian claims to the lands they formerly occupied. Treaties were signed which marginalized the Indians. Their lands were used to secure the debt to English banks. Without Confederation there would be no loans. But make no mistake powerful interests in Canada East wanted the railroad. Bankers wanted the railroad. Most of the industry connected to building the railroad was established in Quebec. The residential schools were seen as necessary in jurisdictions across North America. Enlightened people understood the eventual plight of Indians was dire unless the Indians were given the means to survive within the evolving society. Schools were seen as the solution — and the solution, education — was seen as a universal solution deemed essential for the children of non-natives as well. The Catholic Church had been responsible for education long before 1867.
Was it perfect? How could it have been? But to suggest there was a Holocaust is specious lie. Was it devastating for the Indians and their way of life? Yes it was. But reflect on how fatally devastating it would most likely have turned out without education.
Justin Trudeau has pandered to the idea that Anglo’s are responsible for marginalizing the Indians. Exactly the way Pierre Trudeau did in pandering to the lie that Anglo’s had cheated the Francophones. In both instances the truth is that Anglos were a product of the enlightenment as were the Scottish whom without the railroads would never have been built. It was Scottish engineers, surveyors, mining engineers, manufacturing engineers, metallurgists, chemists, not to mention stone masons who built the railroad. Imagine if the ancien regime had prevented Confederation.
YES. After Trudeau gets all his photo ops. Will Canadians see King Charles III on our coinage. I highly doubt it. Trudeau is a narcissist flake and puppet. Singh is blocking democracy from working, just criminal. These people don't serve the country like queen Elizabeth did, they only use their positions to TAKE FOR THEMSELVES, to Enrich themselves. Just Blood Suckers.
But idk. I think there is still sentimental ties with some First Nations and the crown. I’m thinking many might worry about what they have and don’t want to lose it.
They might agree to it if Trudeau gives them the moon in a new constitution. That would be scary. I don’t know if Alberta and Saskatchewan would tolerate it. I don’t think I could stomach it myself. Lol
Excellent summary that all Canadians NEED to hear!
Appreciated
Queen Elizabeth united some Britons. Charles will divide them and my guess is that he will soon be forced to step down.
.
Trudeau will do what ever creates the most damage and harm ... GUARANTEED.
.
Charles could be a Monarch equivalent to Trudeau. Meaning he would destroy the institution that placed him as king.
Yes. i don’t trust either one of them.
The most damage and harm...a specialty of a democracy destroyer
Guess again. Whomever is the King of England or the Queen of England serves as a representative of a long established code of jurisprudence, government, and a structure resilient but flexible over time. Of course these people are human not gods. It is not that the English monarchy is omnipotent — it is they represent an established form of social cohesion. Without which most likely there would be chaos. In fact the best argument for the benefits of such an established system of governance is Justin Trudeau, where the lack of a countervailing system of restraint, and tradition, allows him to ride roughshod over Canadas constitutional arrangements — done without restraint.
He has abrogated any number of established rights without such restraints which I find abhorrent. The English system is essentially precedent. The Canadian system is with recourse to the Charter which is proving to be as malleable in his hands as any dictator could want. In Canada the Supreme Court tends to make laws rather than interpret them. This is a precedent apt to render laws meaninglessly indeterminate and unpredictable. Citizens then depend on chance and influence to receive Justice. To my mind Justin Trudeau is a public menace.
The truckers had every established right of assembly to bring their complaints to the seat of Government. Whether you or I or Justin Trudeau agreed with them or not he treated them as though he was king and the truckers were petitioners. Justin Trudeau was elected to serve the truckers. He ran roughshod over them but much worse their rights. Their rights are our rights.
Do Canadians really want a dictator ruling them. Long established precedent would have served Canadians in the instance. Only tradition and precedent enables a people to trust their institutions and to trust those whom we expect to protect our established rights. The entire establishment abdicated. The premiers could have assembled in Ottawa to protest Trudeau’s overreach, but they didn’t. The Governor General did nothing. The Judiciary did nothing. Canadians have been seduced by progressivism — a silly dialectic where absolutism is guaranteed to sneak in the back door. Absolutism is a chimera. Justin Trudeau acted as though he had absolute freedom to do as he pleased. The public failed to protest! Why? Because they have come to believe that any form of restraint is an unnecessary encumbrance. Trudeau is simply doing “his own thing.”
Please predict the next few years with Trudeau doing his own thing. However, as you wrote, it’s not just Trudeau it’s the entire establishment of premiers, etc. What will Canada look like in 10 years? Thanks.
Agreat summary. Discouraged with the way it might go. Charles is so in line with Trudope’s thinking. Scary.
Agree and Charles is tight with Trudope and WEF, etc. more rough times ahead???
Everyone must quickly educate themselves with respect to the Coronation Oath as well as Common Law, as it is the supreme law, even superseding our Constitutional Rights and Freedoms. I listened to a webinar last night with Action4Canada as the hosts and David Lindsay as the guest, who gave a brief overview of Common Law and the Coronation Oath. David will be presenting a series of webinars beginning in September sometime, and over the course of a few months, will be covering many topics on the above topic. You could check www.action4canada.com and can also send an email to clear2012@pm.me for more information. It would come as no surprise to find that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Jagmeet Singh and all the liberal MPs will do their utmost to sever Canada's ties with the British Crown.
Canadians do not know they have been subjected to lies and propaganda since before 1867. England had nothing to do with legislation passed in Canada to form a federation here. Why would the monarchy object. Here’s why not.
The monarchy is no more than a figurehead and since Olivier Cromwell England’s finances were controlled by Jews. The Lower Canada elite did not want a Confederation nor a Federation except they had to do something to arrest the waning fortunes of those in power in Quebec. Louis-Joseph Papineau described Lower Canada as a distinct geographic, economic and cultural space, forever destined to serve the Habitant as a Catholic and French nation.
Papineau and his supporters wanted to preserve the ancien regime.
Eventually the elite in Canada East came to realize that without a trans-Canada railroad the gradual erosion of Francophone power in North America was doomed.
Bankers in England, of course, well understood lending money for railroad expansion, without certain security, was not a good bet. The answer was a larger entity than Canada East. Confederation of course was seen as an existential compromise. Shrewdly Lower Canada opted for a federation, although it was called a Confederation. Certain established peoples though blocked the railroad. The Indians and the Métis. It was not the English after 1867 deciding policy in Canada. Canada’s elected parliament rejected Métis claims and Indian claims to the lands they formerly occupied. Treaties were signed which marginalized the Indians. Their lands were used to secure the debt to English banks. Without Confederation there would be no loans. But make no mistake powerful interests in Canada East wanted the railroad. Bankers wanted the railroad. Most of the industry connected to building the railroad was established in Quebec. The residential schools were seen as necessary in jurisdictions across North America. Enlightened people understood the eventual plight of Indians was dire unless the Indians were given the means to survive within the evolving society. Schools were seen as the solution — and the solution, education — was seen as a universal solution deemed essential for the children of non-natives as well. The Catholic Church had been responsible for education long before 1867.
Was it perfect? How could it have been? But to suggest there was a Holocaust is specious lie. Was it devastating for the Indians and their way of life? Yes it was. But reflect on how fatally devastating it would most likely have turned out without education.
Justin Trudeau has pandered to the idea that Anglo’s are responsible for marginalizing the Indians. Exactly the way Pierre Trudeau did in pandering to the lie that Anglo’s had cheated the Francophones. In both instances the truth is that Anglos were a product of the enlightenment as were the Scottish whom without the railroads would never have been built. It was Scottish engineers, surveyors, mining engineers, manufacturing engineers, metallurgists, chemists, not to mention stone masons who built the railroad. Imagine if the ancien regime had prevented Confederation.
Justin may be the King of Toronto and Ottawa but not much else.
.
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AiGnteD9iWfngTOVs0kTqut5xJ5_
.
YES. After Trudeau gets all his photo ops. Will Canadians see King Charles III on our coinage. I highly doubt it. Trudeau is a narcissist flake and puppet. Singh is blocking democracy from working, just criminal. These people don't serve the country like queen Elizabeth did, they only use their positions to TAKE FOR THEMSELVES, to Enrich themselves. Just Blood Suckers.
I used to think the same thing.
But idk. I think there is still sentimental ties with some First Nations and the crown. I’m thinking many might worry about what they have and don’t want to lose it.
They might agree to it if Trudeau gives them the moon in a new constitution. That would be scary. I don’t know if Alberta and Saskatchewan would tolerate it. I don’t think I could stomach it myself. Lol
A good but sad summary for Canadians!!!
Of course! And has been well and long planned! Who will we “belong” to now? Trudeau is now going to be King? It will be easy.
King? He acts like he is already. 🤮🤮🤮
But is he in the How Dare You role yet?
hope not! but interesting you say so.